Local Leader Interviews

Click here for a list of all the interviews with #localleaders.

Monday, March 12, 2018

2018-03-07 - Board of Supervisors Meetings Notes

The Board of Supervisors began their March 7, 2018 meeting at 7:23 pm. There were a number of people in the audience and several of them spoke during public comment.

Dick Schiebe started the public comment section of the meeting by saying he was there to talk about the news reporting done on the consideration of Smoot Library being taken over by Central Rappahannock Regional Library (CRRL). He said he was here when Mrs. Smoot was here and remembers them building the curvy wall out front. He said the $700,000 Mrs. Smoot gave to run the library isn't enough to support the library now but was pretty good back then. Schiebe said we should not lose our independence just to save 25% of the operating budget. He said only four percent of the county was using the regional library and strongly encouraged the Board to keep this asset of the county.

Weldon Burt was next to speak his concerns for the library moving to CRRL. He said he volunteers at Smoot. He also said he wanted to make it clear he wasn't maligning CRRL because it's a good fit for their community, just like Smoot is a good fit for ours. He said Smoot has an excellent staff and they can offer classes quickly instead of waiting six to eight months. He said many people left big cities to move to small towns and the library maintains that feel of the small town that many are looking for. He said it's not just a bunch of bookshelves, it's a community of people. He also encouraged others to volunteer.

Dee Strauss then gave the only non-library comments and gave the Board an update on the recent state level DECA conference that was held in Virginia Beach. She said the local chapter from King George High School fielded 49 students and competed in 28 events. Strauss said the chapter was recognized as a Star and Super-Star chapter and many participants won awards and medals. She thanked the chaperones and judges who traveled from the area to the event and said several students would be attending the International conference coming up.

As Strauss handed the Board programs from the recent event, Ruby Brabo thanked her for her supporting DECA.

Bob Baird then made a few public comments. He started by complimenting Mrs. Strauss and the school administration for exposing students to the world of work. He then expressed his opinion on the Smoot Library. He said it opened during his Junior year in high school and he has used it, along with many other libraries, to do research over the years. He said we have a wonderful library and it's an underutilized resource and wasn't sure how the idea of merging with CRRL came to the table. He suggested those involved should survey the citizens to get their opinion on what they want from the library as he's heard strong reactions from both sides.

Carol Werle spoke next and said it wasn't just about the library but the way we spend money. She thanked the Board for the effort they put into the job and knows that they inherit some of the problems of the past. She said Port Royal almost became the capital after the burning of Jamestown. Werle said we make decisions based on history and that if you don't know history then you make the same mistake again. She continued on until Richard Granger broke in briefly to remind her to try to keep her comments to three minutes. She closed by saying that a study done in 2010 talked about the goal debt limit was $10 million and that it's now about $110 million and that maybe the debt service is behind the decision.

Tammy Wagner was next to add her comments about the library. She said she was a homeschooler and represents a large and growing group of people. She said she moved here 20 years ago and shortly after joined CRRL to get access to more material. She said back then, they were the only ones with computers and internet. She also said her youngest could only find one copy of their favorite series at Smoot but several copies at CRRL.

Hannah, a 17 year old minor, followed with her comments. She said she was a member of both CRRL and Smoot and that as a student, the books she needed were not available at Smoot. She said she can get extra copies from other branches of CRRL and that Governor's School students can get what they need from CRRL to get their homework done. She finished by saying we should join CRRL.

Jim Lynch was next to speak and said he was a member of both CRRL and Smoot. He encouraged the Board to be as open as possible in discussions and involve the public as much as possible. He said he had no advice for the Board but encouraged them to have a Town Hall about the topic.

Kim Dodge was the final speaker for Public Comment. She said she has been listening to both sides about the library. She said as a homeschooler that has lived in remote areas in the past, she never had any issues getting materials. She said she joined coops and other groups. Dodge didn't see why Smoot should join CRRL for this and should keep Smoot where it is for history. She closed by saying she didn't see a problem in spending $30 to join CRRL.

The Board then began with their reports. John Jenkins was first and said he was not unappreciative of the library, volunteers, history, or services provided. He said just like any service provided, we're always assessing and looking at ways to improve. He doesn't think there's any chance for a rash reaction. He then thanked Mrs. Strauss for her work with the DECA program. Jenkins also thanked Emergency Services for their hard work last week. He said he heard of a lot of reports of damage and that anyone with damage from the storm should report it via email - kgdamage@firerescue.com - or online. He closed by saying he attended the GWRC and FAMPO meetings on February 26th.

Jeff Bueche began his report by thanking everyone that spoke about the library. He said they were simply trying to gather information to make an educated decision. He said nothing was set in stone and no decision had been made. They were looking to see what would be gained or lost and that the Smoot Library Board of Trustees had been invited to have a discussion in closed session. He said he was getting questions about not being transparent but because it was discussed in closed session, nothing was public at this time. He thanked both sides for speaking out. Bueche then congratulated Mrs. Strauss for DECA and again said he was impressed by everyone at the career night. He then addressed Mrs. Werle's concern that the source of the potential library change was due to the debt service. He said this was not the case and that Davenport, the County's financial advisors, gave a debt mitigation plan at the last budget work session. Bueche then said he attended the award ceremony for Jim Howard on February 22nd and expressed his condolences on the death of Howard's mother. Bueche said he attended the budget work session on the 28th. He was impressed by the number of neighbors looking out for each other during and after the recent storms. He thanked the line crews and emergency services for all their hard work and their constant communication. From March 3rd to the 6th, he attended his first National Association of Counties (NACO) conference and was highly impressed. He thanked Brabo and Dr. Young for helping navigate all the sessions and making introductions. He said there were a lot of lessons learned and the experience was very educational. Bueche also mentioned that while he is active duty military, he attends all County functions and conducts County business while on official leave status. He said prior to being elected, he had accrued leave time for this reason.

Ruby Brabo started by saying that there has been a lot of misinformation out there in regards to the library conversation. She said no decisions have been made but a request for information has been made. She said that in budget sessions from previous years, this [the potential merger] has been looked into. Pros and cons are being discussed but nothing is being done behind closed doors. She said the Board of Trustees and Library Director were invited to ensure we're protecting the interests of King George County. She thanked Hannah and said she loves to see students come forward to speak and encouraged others to do so. Brabo said that as a parent, she found the library adequate for their needs but once the kids hit middle school, not so much. She said the Board of Trustees was charged with understanding what the community needs. Brabo said over 1,000 citizens have felt the need to join CRRL. She said the reason the conversation began two years ago is because the amount of money put into the operating budget isn't seeing a return of investment. She said regionalism may not always be the answer and when the time comes, the Board will frame it for the community. Brabo then listed the meetings she attended, starting with the Tri-County City Soil Water meeting on February 21st. The next day she met with Congressman Wittman and other local leaders regarding the recent move of the Chem/Bio division from Dahlgren to Indianhead. She said Wittman asked her to keep the details of the conversation out of the public for the time being. She attended GWRC and FAMPO meetings on the 26th and the budget work session on the 28th. She closed by saying she attended the NACO conference from March 3rd through the 7th.

Cathy Binder then gave her report by saying she attended the recent home show on March 3rd and 4th. She also attended the budget work session on February 28th and a meeting for Rappahannock Area Agency on Aging on March 7th. Binder then congratulated Mrs. Strauss and the DECA participants. She also thanked everyone who spoke about the library. She said she reached out to the Governor's School teachers and many spoke to her at the home show about the pros and cons. She also thanked the emergency services for their help during the storms.

Richard Granger was the last to give a report. He started by thanking emergency services for their service and thanked everyone who spoke about the library. He said his colleagues "spoke to it greatly" so he would just say "ditto." He then read a resolution to celebrate John Cornette and the El Tierra Farm regarding their winning the 2017 Clean Water Farm and Bay-Friendly Farm Award.




The Consent Agenda was approved without comment.

Judge Vance, a Constitutional Officer, spoke to the Board in support of the County Clerk Office's request for a two percent increase in salary. He said the two percent request totaled $3,568. He explained that clerks often leave because they aren't paid enough and that over the last 15 years, they've only received a 13 percent increase. He said the clerks here do a good job. He said many localities in the area do this by either a one-time payment or a percentage increase. He closed by saying he thought a two percent increase was reasonable.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Granger then introduced both Public Hearings but Brabo clarified that they were two distinct hearings. Dr. Young gave a brief overview of the Pine Forest Apartments project and advised the Board of his recommendation to approve it. There was no public comment. A motion was made and passed to approve the project.

Gregory then gave a brief update on the ProjectFAITH project by saying they had requested a delay. He clarified that a Public Hearing could still be held tonight and any comments could still count towards a final decision. There was no public comment and no action taken.

The Tri-County City Soil and Water District Manager, Marta Perry, then gave a brief presentation about her group and what they do. She gave the Board handouts and proceeded into a brief overview of the groups history. She said the local district formed in 1944, consisting of King George, Stafford, and Spotsylvania. She said she was grateful for all of the support from localities. Perry explained that the group exists to help solve conservation issues and to keep soil in place while keeping rivers clean and preventing soil erosion. The group also helps with agricultural conservation and shares best management practices, resources, and grants. She also said some non-agricultural projects, such as rain gardens and permeable paving, are also done to solve for erosion. She closed by saying they have a lending library to help teachers and sell seedlings and rain barrels.

Next on the Agenda was a request from Dashan Turner of King George County Schools to use the contingency fund of $100,000 from the Energy Performance Contract with Honeywell. He said there were no problems with this project but Dr. Young recommended tabling the decision until staff could do research. A motion was made and approved to table the decision until the next regular meeting on March 20th.

Wilma Ward, Director of the Finance Department, then asked for authorization to re-appropriate $112,781 in funds from the Instruction category to the Facilities category in order to complete the modular building installation at Potomac Elementary School. Again, a motion was made and approved to table the decision until March 20th.

Dr. Young then gave a summary of the FAMPO request for representatives for the Technical Committee. He recommended Ryan Gandy and Brad Hudson as the primary representatives and Annie Cupka and Kyle Conboy as alternates. They were approved without comment. Brabo did comment that the Citizen Advisory Committee for FAMPO had three openings and that she had heard from Rob Gates and Leslie Jordan as being interested in serving. Granger said he would rather wait until March 20th in hopes that others would step up and they could all be approved at once.

Dr. Young then began his report by thanking Judge Vance for promoting a veteran's court being formed in Spotsylvania. He also said that Carol Werle's comment about the Ralph Bunche developer asking for $3 million wasn't true. Young said the newly formed Regional Transportation Authority would meet for the first time on March 28th and that a joint meeting with the Planning Commission would be coming soon.

The Board then went into closed session with legal counsel at 8:49 pm regarding Smoot Library and returned at 9:33 pm. The meeting adjourned at 9:34 pm.

Meeting Attendees:
John Jenkins (Board of Supervisors)
Jeff Bueche (Board of Supervisors)
Richard Granger (Chairman, Board of Supervisors)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Board of Supervisors will next meet on March 20, 2018 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Board of Supervisors Meeting.

2018-03-07 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

The Service Authority Board of Directors started their March 7, 2018 meeting promptly at 6:30pm. There was an amendment to the Agenda to add a Closed Session after the General Manager's report.

There was no public comment.

Mike Bennett had no report. Richard Granger reported that he attended the budget works session on February 27th. Ruby Brabo said she also attended the work session and commented that Mr. Bennett also attended. Cathy Binder said she attended the work session as well and got great feedback from citizens. Chris Werle said he met with the County Administrator, Dr. Neiman Young, the Service Authority General Manager, Chris Thomas, and representatives from KGI Communications. A one year lease was signed to allow KGI to use tower space for their broadband internet. Werle attended the budget work session as well and on February 28th met with Dr. Young, Thomas, and Echelon Resources, the developer of Ralph Bunche to discuss water supply needs.

The Consent Agenda was passed without comment and the County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Chris Thomas began his report with an update on the recent wind storm that went through the area. He said that there were power outages throughout the County but the Service Authority did not experience any outages. He said all of the backup generators worked as designed although two did not start automatically due to the surges. He said an employee was on site to start them manually.

Brabo asked if Thomas could elaborate about the Fire Department asking for storm damage information. Thomas said they gather information from across the County and will assess a dollar amount. This will then be sent to Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) to help determine if there is a need for money to help with repairs. Brabo encouraged citizens to submit their storm damage information via email - kgdamage@firerescue.com - or online. Werle also commented that VDEM helps give money to localities impacted by storm damage.

Closed Session for the discussion of a legal matter began at 6:41 pm and ended at 7:19 pm. The meeting adjourned shortly after.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Chairman, Board of Directors)
Christopher Thomas (General Manager of Service Authority)
Michael Bennett (Citizen)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)


Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on March 20, 2018 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

OPINION - Citizen Budget Advisory Committee - Part 3

With the first two meetings of the Citizen Budget Advisory Committee, we focused a lot of our time on where we were financially as a County. With our most recent meeting on February 28, 2018, we focused a lot of our time on actually working on the budget.

We began the meeting with a few updates on questions from previous meetings. During our last meeting we discussed and heard from Outside Agencies and their requests for funding from the County. This was again discussed, briefly, as the Fredericksburg Area Food Bank and Thurman Brisben Homeless Shelter would see some changes to their funding. The Clerk of the Court, Vic Mason, also let Dr. Young know that he needed a Part-Time position to help with an increased work-load. The position would put the Clerk's Office back to the same staffing level as it was in 2010.

This would be a good point to pause and remind readers of two things. First, these are just work sessions. The final decisions won't be made until after public hearings are held. So if you want to voice your opinion, you still have time, be it at the work sessions or at the Board meetings. Second, as a citizen-member of this committee, I have no vote in the final budget. I only have a seat at the table where I can voice my opinion and ask questions. And with five Supervisors and five citizens, there's bound to be a difference of opinion. Thankfully, everything has been very professional and respectful, regardless of who has what opinion.

Now, back to the meeting. We jumped head-first into the briefing from Davenport & Company, the County's financial advisor for the past few decades. Going through the details of the report was a little time consuming. We waded through the history of Davenport, how the County's credit ratings were determined, and the County's fund balance levels. In a nutshell, it all boiled down to similarities that you would see in personal finance.

While it was noted that there were distinct differences between the County's financial world and an individual's financial world, there are still some parallel themes. For example, looking at credit scores, a positive score will allow for better interest rates when borrowing money. A higher fund balance would be like having more money in your savings account. Even in looking at the debt and debt policy, you can see similarities. If you think of the County's debt as a home mortgage, there's principal and interest to pay for a set period of time. The County's debt policy is similar to not being able to borrow more than a set percentage of your income. In other words, the rule of thumb about not spending more than 28% of your income on a mortgage would be similar to the County's policy of not having more than 12% of expenditures be for debt service.

Eventually, we came to Davenport's financial plan. The key terms were "debt reduction" and "debt mitigation." The first being a plan for paying down the County's debt and the second being a fiscal policy of controlling debt going forward. Kind of like paying off that credit card debt and then not going into debt in the future. We were finally deep into the budget process and plans for the future.

With such a positive credit score and solid fund balances, it would be a balancing act to find a sweet spot to take some excess money out (like taking money out of savings) to pay down the debt early. And if tax rates weren't equalized, that would mean a larger chunk of debt gets paid off sooner. To go back to that home mortgage analogy, if you pay off a large portion of your principle now, you'll avoid paying interest in the future. So a proposed $9 million payment in four years would result in a savings of $13 million over the remaining 25 year life of the debt. Simply put, if we take a small hit now in the wallet or pocket book, we'll avoid a larger one in the future.

To top all of that off, this plan assumes that the County doesn't borrow more in the future. And the general impression I got from listening to and watching the Supervisors was none of them wanted to add to that debt amount. "Cash funding" was the catch-phrase of the evening and appeared to be the plan going forward. Like any financial plan, cash funding would of course mean less money to pay down the debt or less money to pay for large capital improvement projects. So taking a large amount of money out of your savings account to pay for that kitchen remodel may be great but it also means you won't be able to pay off all those credit cards just yet.

This is where Davenport suggested a Public Private Partnership (P3) for larger capital projects. As an example, to help fund a new courthouse, the County could invite developers to build retail or residential sites at the same time. Essentially a mutually beneficial partnership where both sides get something out of the deal. This practice is used in many places across the country and the globe but it didn't sound like it was used all too often in Virginia. So looking in this direction may put us in the proverbial driver's seat when it comes to bargaining.

Now that the major portion of the meeting was over, it was time to get into specifics. We got to dig into three specific departments and their respective budgets line by line. Frankly, it was tedious. But it was also educational. As with this whole budgeting process, I've learned a lot about the County's finances as a whole, but this gave me a much deeper insight into what actually makes up specific amounts on the budget.

First to present was Randy Jones, Treasurer. Category by category, he went through his proposed budget and explained why he needed each dollar he asked for. Some categories didn't garner any questions, some drew a lot. While the new Board has routinely shown itself to be pretty conservative with spending, I was a little shocked, yet pleased, when they were willing to fund educational items, such as conferences and training classes, for employees. There was also some discussion about consolidating some of the assets, services, and contracts across departments to reduce waste and build a more forward-looking plan for future budgets. Dr. Young said he was already looking at some things and already moving in this direction.

Mike Muncie, Director of General Properties, was next in the hot seat. He too faced similar questions asking for clarity on certain items in his budget. The only real surprise came with a position that was new for this budget cycle. It was explained that the employee had been hired shortly after the last budget has been approved and the Board quickly moved on once they had clarity. Muncie was able to answer to all of the questions, just as Jones did. Jeff Bueche did pause and comment that he wished more people knew about the County paying for water and sewer just like all of the other Service Authority customers.

Next up was Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, who walked through the Administration and the Board of Supervisors budgets. Again, the Supervisors were supportive of continuing education and training for the staff, and pushed Dr. Young to increase those line items if necessary. And to prove they were not exempt from special treatment, the Supervisors took themselves to task on a few items in their own budget, specifically Office Supplies.

After nearly four hours of diligent work, the meeting ended. As expected, I learned a lot. However, I did not expect to spend quite so much time working through so many different topics. Thankfully we all agreed to continue working beyond our planned end time. I truly felt like we were working and making progress, something I have found to be rare in most of the professional meetings I've attended in my career.

As we wrapped up the evening, we unfortunately did not get to the topic of equalization of the tax rates. We did learn that the School Board would be delayed in presenting their budget, pushing our timeline back a little bit. We also managed to schedule our next few meetings though so things should continue on soon enough.

Monday, March 5, 2018

Five Picturesque Spots Around King George County

Out and About

Not too long ago, this little town was the perfect place to get away from it all.  When my parents moved here back in the summer of 1969, there was one stoplight, single lane roads, and farmland for miles.  My father specifically picked Dahlgren, VA for his employment because of it’s rural nature.   
Turns out a lot of people feel the same way…..
We all know why we are drawn to KG.  We all know the vibrancy and placement of this town is a magnetic pull to settle down and build memories.  One of my favorite parts is that I can get anywhere in 15 minutes.  
As Spring edges in this early March, I have a few spots that remind me of the beauty of KG every time and a new spot that inspires me to keep digging for the most picturesque areas of our hometown.
Here are my current favorites:
  1. The old brick corner (The ruins of Office Hall) on Kings Highway past Tractor Supply.    


  1. Wilmont Landing off of Kings Highway.  What a beautiful surprise to come upon while driving!  


  1. The Marina at the end of Potomac Drive.   

  1. The Wayside Beach and Park near the Nice Bridge.  Perfect spot for picnics. 



  1. The kids creek jumping spot at Barnesfield Park.  All kids seem drawn to this little spot while their siblings are practicing ball.  



What say you?  What are the most picturesque spots in KG?  Which areas remind you of why you love living here?  Which little scenic overlooks inspire you the most?    



Friday, March 2, 2018

History of the Service Authority - Part 1 - 1948 to 1959

The Service Authority as we know it today is experiencing a serious public relations challenge. With aging infrastructure, water quality issues, and sub-standard customer service, the Service Authority is frequently in the news for all the wrong reasons. At a recent Town Hall hosted by Supervisor Jeff Bueche, the event ran much longer than planned and only a handful of questions and comments were not related to the issues facing the County’s largest water supplier.

In an effort to better understand how the Service Authority came to where it is today, we felt it was necessary to first research how it came into existence and then share with the community as a whole what we found. As it stands now, the Service Authority services about 4,100 customers in King George County. Of those customers, most are water only customers. The customers are served by nine different water systems and five wastewater treatment plants.

The Service Authority as we know it today wasn’t formed until 1992 and didn’t really begin operating until 1994. But the history behind where we are now began long before that. Beginning in the late 1940s, King George County began discussing the need for a centralized water system. By 1948, George Glasco was appointed as “a roving committee of one” to talk to potential customers, or as they were called then, subscribers. The need for the centralized water system was driven by the King George Volunteer Fire Department. They had recently received property donated by Conor Clare to build a fire house in the Courthouse area but they had no public source for water to help fight fires.

While the fire department was looking for a source of water, the local water and sewer systems were all owned by private individuals. Those systems fell under the “advice and supervision” of the local Sanitation Officer, Ben I. Johns and later Robert Lindsay Albinson. Dr. Hubert Dinwiddie Crow was the local Health Officer in charge of the local Health District that covered several area counties. When Albinson was appointed as the new Sanitation Officer, he had to cover fifteen counties and Fredericksburg City. He would be replaced within a year by Richard A. Johnson.

In 1951, Mr. Sydnor of Sydnor Pump and Well Company, met with the local Ruritan Club to talk about a potential water system. Things continued to progress in King George and local areas as Spotsylvania County wrote and passed an ordinance for sewer systems in 1952. King George would follow suit with one in 1953. Dr. Crow presented the new ordinance for permits for “sewerage disposal systems.” The ordinance would cover new construction or repairs made to existing systems. Dr. Crow’s aim was to help prevent the “typhoid fever menace” that was present in various parts of the county. Prior to the new ordinance being passed in 1953, there were no previously existing rules to govern water and sewer.

Septic Tank requirements


Dr. Crow would continue to serve as Health Director until 1956 when he was replaced by Dr. Frederick J. Spencer, one of his trainees. Dr. Crow would die shortly after in 1957. Dr. Spencer’s son, Tony Spencer, would go on to become the Commonwealth’s Attorney for Caroline County for a period of time.

Dr. Crow’s efforts for a sanitary water and sewer system and the fire department’s need of a constant and stable water supply would be the foundation of what would eventually become the King George County Service Authority. Even then, water quality and the health and safety of the general public were on the minds of local leaders. With new laws put into place, the County had a foundation for enforcing rules that would protect the public from disease. With a public water supply, the fire department could better respond to fires. These are just small steps towards becoming the Service Authority of today.

Stay tuned as we continue to research the history of the King George County Service Authority.

Thursday, March 1, 2018

OPINION - Service Authority Budget Work Session

I attended the Service Authority's budget work session on February 27, 2018 with my wife. We were the only members of the public in attendance. This budget work session was similar to the previous ones I've attended as a member of the County's Citizen Budget Advisory Committee. Just like the budget work sessions for the County, the Service Authority has appointed citizens to serve in an advisory role during the budget work sessions. And just like my role on the County's Committee, these citizens are invited to attend the work sessions, give feedback, and ask questions, but do not have a vote when it comes to actually approving the budget. I feel it's a great way to get the public involved in the process and a perfect way to educate those interested in learning more about the process and where all that money goes.

The meeting was attended by Wilma Ward (Director of Finance), Dr. Neiman Young (County Administrator, and the full Board of Directors for the Service Authority. Of the citizens serving on the Committee, Rob Harling, Steven Doss, and Howard Yarus were present. Chris Thomas, the Service Authority General Manager, was also there.

Mr. Thomas started things off with an overview of the Service Authority that included basic facts, a history, and customer counts. He also covered basic details of the debt service fees, rate structure, and concluded with some common ways for customers to conserve water.

As with the County's budget work session, the atmosphere was much more casual with several interruptions from various committee members asking questions. Where the Service Authority broke from the County's format was when my wife asked questions. While public comment was allowed at the beginning of the meeting, it's usually not allowed during these types of meetings. However, the Committee seemed willing to allow the deviation from protocol and her questions were readily answered.

As we here at Project94 research the history of the Service Authority, I was able to learn more about the entity as a whole. Most interesting to me is that the Service Authority is technically a separate entity from the County. While some employees, staff, and Board members share roles on both sides of the proverbial fence, they are two different entities. Historically, the Board of Directors has been the Board of Supervisors. Beginning a couple of years ago, a move was made to change the Board to a more non-political membership with Chris Werle being appointed. With Mike Bennett's appointment this year, there are now two non-elected, private citizens serving on the Board.

I knew most of the basic details about the nine water systems in the County but I was not aware that the Service Authority ran five different wastewater treatment plants. All of these plants are running below their full capacity, which in some cases is a good thing and in some cases a bad thing. I thought of it like that swimming pool your neighbor uses twice a year. It costs them money to operate but it isn't used to it's full potential. One good question that was answered was how the base in Dahlgren factors in. In a word, they don't. The base functions independently of the Service Authority.

The water rates and debt fees have long been a hot topic among customers but during the meeting it was less so. Many on the Board already knew the history behind the recent changes in rates and debt service fees but it was nice to get a review from Thomas. He gave a break-down of how rates had actually decreased from last year in an effort to off-set some of the increases in debt fees. And with a restructuring of the minimum usage rates and tier structure, the goal was to more towards a "pay for what you use" system.

Out of this portion of the discussion, what I found interesting is that there are roughly 60 customers that are not metered. For various reasons, a meter could not be installed. Personally, I know of at least one customer who does not have a meter because their supply line could not be found. This was confirmed by Thomas as one of the reasons the Service Authority has customers in this category. Another is that a meter was never installed for some reason and now the property owners won't allow the Service Authority to install a meter. In other words, as a private property owner, it's your right to deny access to the Service Authority to dig up your yard and install a meter. Unless you already have a meter, then they have the right to access it.

Another interesting tidbit from this discussion was the topic of tampering with meters. Despite attempts to lock meters, remove meters, or somehow secure them, some customers have found ways to circumvent the system in an effort to avoid paying for the water they use. It doesn't sound like this is a common practice across the County but it does sound like the Service Authority has been working hard to make it harder for people to tamper with the meters.

Thomas concluded with some homework for the Committee. He handed out the proposed expenditures for the upcoming budget cycle and, despite the County developing a two-year budget, said he was very hesitant to develop a second year because of all the variables involved. Bennett and Werle both commented that they went through the expenditures with Thomas and every line-item they looked at reducing or had questions on had a data to back up the proposed number.

In the end, I highly encourage anyone and everyone that's interested in the Service Authority's budget, or the County's or even the School Board's, to attend these work sessions. They are highly informative, the atmosphere is typically less uptight than a regular meeting, and you get to hear from the directly involved why things cost what they cost.

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

REVIEW: "Black Panther" Breaks Barriers, and the Marvel Mold, to Thrilling Effect


Anyone who reads my blog knows I’m not the biggest fan of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  It’s not that I don’t like the characters, or appreciate the attempt to translate the sprawling Marvel Universe to film; it’s just that the films have, in recent years, traded originality for security.  They’ve been formulaic and have leaned heavily on established characters, like Robert Downey Jr.’s Iron Man, to get behinds in seats.  And that’s taken away from the storytelling, and the unique voice of each character that every film should have.  Marvel has even, in these last several years, moved away from employing film directors like Jon Favreau (“Iron Man,” “Iron Man 2,”), Kenneth Branagh (“Thor”) or Joss Whedon (“Avengers”), in favor of workmanlike TV directors such as Joe and Anthony Russo (“Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” “Captain America: Civil War”), who, prior to their association with Marvel were mostly known for shows like “Community” and “Arrested Development.” 

Marvel’s troubles deepened when Patty Jenkins (“Monster,” “Wonder Woman”) turned down “Thor: The Dark World” and Whedon walked away from the franchise after “Avengers: Age of Ultron.”  Most recently, Ava Duvernay (“Selma”) turned down the opportunity to do “Black Panther” because she felt that Marvel was too hands-on and wouldn’t let her make the film she wanted to make.  Enter Ryan Coogler. 

Ryan Coogler’s first film (as writer and director) was “Fruitvale Station,” starring Michael B. Jordan, the true story of Oscar Grant, a Bay area resident who was killed in Fruitvale Station on New Years’ Eve 2008.  The film got a lot of attention at film festivals and won a lot of awards, including an AFI Award for Movie of the Year.  It made Michael B. Jordan a star almost overnight.  He went on to star as the Human Torch in Josh Trank’s “Fantastic Four” reboot, and then as Adonis Creed in the “Rocky” spinoff, “Creed,” written and directed by Coogler. 

Coming off of the success of “Creed,” which also won a ton of awards and saw Sylvester Stallone nominated for an Oscar for his supporting role as Rocky Balboa (he did take home the Golden Globe for the performance, at least), Coogler was approached to direct “Black Panther.”  I like Ryan Coogler’s work, he’s a very talented man and when I heard he was doing “Panther” I was surprised because Marvel is notorious for losing talented directors.  But it also meant I became more interested in “Black Panther” because it stood a chance of not being the same regurgitated paint-by-numbers superhero movie that Marvel has become famous for making (guy is a jerk, guy gets power, guy loses power because he’s a jerk, guy learns to be less of a jerk -- possibly with the help of a previously established Marvel hero -- guy gets power back, guy beats villain, the end).  From 2008’s “Iron Man” to last year’s “Doctor Strange” and “Spiderman: Homecoming,” the plot hasn’t varied too much. 

I’m happy to say that Ryan Coogler hits a home run, and delivers the best Marvel film in years.  Much like DC and Warner Bros. made the right decision in giving Patty Jenkins the keys to Wonder Woman, and much like Jenkins successfully walked the line between making the film the studio wanted, and injecting her own voice and sensibility into the film, creating something special, so too does Coogler handle the demands of a mega-budget franchise film with the focus and assurance of a truly great filmmaker.

Left to right: Lupita Nyong'o, Chadwick Boseman, and Danai Gurira in Marvel's "Black Panther".
From the film’s opening, in Oakland, California in the 1990’s, kids shooting b-ball through a milk crate nailed to a sheet of plywood, it’s clear that this is a different kind of Marvel movie.  It feels real and immediate, and it looks real, too.  Many of these superhero films take the alternate reality aspect to the level that you don’t recognize the world they’re set in as our own.  “Panther,” though, knows that it has some work to do because you’re about to see a movie about a fictional African country called Wakanda, that exists in a cloaking field, and we’ll buy that as long as we can still recognize the world as our own.  The sequences in Wakanda are beautiful, and the performances are all top-notch.  I’ve liked Chadwick Boseman since his turn as Jackie Robinson in “42,” and the beautiful Lupita Nyong’o has been a favorite of mine since “12 Years a Slave.”  She’s utterly wasted in Star Wars as the CGI Maz Kanata, but not so here, where she gets to appear in person and participate in action scenes, particularly the film’s big finale. 

Andy Serkis is back from “Age of Ultron,” reprising his role as arms dealer Ulysses Klaue, and Martin Freeman returns from “Civil War” as Agent Ross.  They’re also, I realized sometime after the film ended, the only two white guys in the whole picture, which is fantastic since in most films those numbers are more or less exactly reversed.  Also of note here, is the fact that no previous established Marvel heroes show up to help Black Panther on his journey.  This is his journey and his alone, but he has an excellent support team in Nyong’o as a spy named Nakia, along with a fierce bodyguard named Okoye, portrayed by Danai Gurira; his tech genius sister Shuri, played by Letitia Wright; Daniel Kaluuya as his military leader W’Kabi; and a couple of well-placed legends: Forest Whitaker as Zuri, and Angela Bassett as Ramonda, Black Panther’s mother. 

And you know Coogler had to put Michael B. Jordan in there somewhere.  He’s Killmonger, the Black Panther’s nemesis, in a twist that beautifully pays off that back-alley b-ball opening in Oakland.  Killmonger, despite his name, is a character who is almost sympathetic.  You hate the things he does (he’s a bad man) but you can understand why he is the way he is, and that lends him a necessary humanity, a three-dimensionality that the best villains have.  And thus, in the best superhero tradition, the final conflict is more than just a power battle, it’s a clash of competing points of view, and the only thing that really decides you on who is right, is the fact that you recoil from how far Killmonger is willing to go to get what he wants. 

The net result?  Even if this wasn’t a “black” movie, it would still be the best Marvel movie in years because Ryan Coogler made all the right choices, and gave us a hero who stands on his own as a compelling character, and will therefore be a worthy addition to the canon.  The fact that it’s a milestone picture, a movie about a black character, with an almost all-black cast, written and directed by a black man, well, that’s why this film is destined for greatness.  In a saturated market, this is a superhero film that stands out as meaningful and important in so many ways, and it has a strong, clear voice, it has a point of view, and it makes its point without insulting or talking down to anyone.  Ryan Coogler’s voice is a good one, and welcome, and I firmly believe he’s about to be highly sought-after in Hollywood.  I hope we see many, many more films out of him – in any genre he wants.