Local Leader Interviews

Click here for a list of all the interviews with #localleaders.

Thursday, April 11, 2019

2019-04-02 - Wireless Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Wireless Authority opened their quarterly meeting at 8:07pm.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

John Jenkins and Richard Granger had no report.

Cathy Binder said she has struggled with wireless issues and understands the pain experienced by residents. She said with her job and her business, she needs that connection to put everything online.

Ruby Brabo shared an update that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had teams of employees dedicated to helping service providers but only one employee to help with rural areas in the entire country. She said that because of this staffing shortfall, the local internet provider, KGI Communications, has been waiting nine months since winning the auction for the white space to provide services. She also asked that residents download and use the TestIT app to help provide a better source of data on internet speeds.

Jeff Bueche had no report.

The was no Consent Agenda.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

The County Administrator, Dr. Neiman Young, had no report.

The meeting adjourned at 8:12pm.


Meeting Attendees:
John Jenkins (Board of Supervisors)
Jeff Bueche (Board of Supervisors)
Richard Granger (Chairman, Board of Supervisors)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Wireless Authority will next meet on June 18, 2019 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Wireless Authority Meeting.

2019-04-02 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

Shortly before the Service Authority Board of Directors opened their meeting, Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, made an announcement that anyone wishing to make Public Comment should sign up on the form in the lobby. He then clarified that that was for anyone wishing to speak during the Board of Supervisors meeting.

The Board of Directors began their meeting at 6:30pm.

There were amendments to the Agenda to add an Action Item regarding the adoption of the Rules and Procedures as well as an amendment to the Rules and Procedures to allow for remote participation in meetings.

Mike Bennett apologized for not including them on the Agenda.

Public Comment began with Kim Dodge, a resident of Hopyard, speaking about the water and sewer rates. Dodge said that she had heard at a previous meeting some comments about maintenance and waste water treatment plants that may need to be closed. She said it was her understanding that when the developer built the Hopyard subdivision, they had to build the sewer system and put that cost into cost of the home which in turn was passed along to the value of the house which meant higher taxes. Dodge said when she first moved here, the rates were fine. She said there were then huge increases. She said one of the solutions she heard about was to raise rates. She also heard from somebody in Presidential Lakes who said their rates were not that bad. She said they pay water and sewer but not the debt fees. Dodge said Hopyard pays more and has to pay local taxes so she was asking to not increase the rates. She said she was asking for this for the whole County. She said the people she talked to in Presidential Lakes didn't mind their bill because they were only paying for one part, not all four.

Christopher Werle was the first to report beginning with his summary of the most recent budget work session the night before on April 1st. Werle said the presentation from Davenport and Associates was a five year plan that laid out various scenarios and options with the ultimate goal of bringing the Service Authority into compliance with the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Additionally, it would provide better financial stability to ensure that Service Authority facilities were maintained and capital improvement plans were made for future needs. Werle said that in his opinion, the best solution included five basic points. First was an increase in rates. Second was maintaining a minimum amount of cash reserves. Third was restructuring part of the existing debt. Fourth was meeting critical financial benchmarks in five years. Fifth was a new line of credit to pay for immediate capital needs. Werle summed things up nicely by saying "Implementing the plan will be painful and add to the substantial financial burden our customers already bear. However, it is needed to ensure the long term financial strength and stability of the KGCSA, and I believe moving forward with it is the right thing to do." He also added that the Board of Directors are obligated to provide the General Manager and Service Authority staff the resources necessary to be successful.

Richard Granger was next to report, starting by thanking Mrs. Dodge for her comments. He corrected her by saying that Presidential Lakes was water only and that residents there had their own septic systems. He also clarified that they did pay for the water debt as well as their water usage. Granger said he attended the budget work session as well and felt that Werle summed things up well.

Werle added that he neglected to respond to Dodge's comments and said that the systems in Hopyard Farm cost $26 million and were proffered to the County as part of negotiations. Werle said he didn't believe the cost of the infrastructure was relevant to the price of a home but that the connection fee was certainly part of the cost of the house. He said he lives there too and the residents of Hopyard are not being penalized. Werle said the Service Authority charges the same rates to everyone as required by law and the only difference is how much a customer uses and what type of customer they are, meaning water only or water and sewer.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: Neither Werle nor Granger mentioned that some residents of Presidential Lakes, specifically those in the Lake Jefferson section, are customers of AQUA Virginia, not the Service Authority. Those customers pay a much higher rate for both water and sewer as well as higher rates for water debt and sewer debt.]

Cathy Binder was next, stating she has been to all of the same budget meetings as well over the past few weeks where they have been reviewing options on how best to get the Service Authority back on the right footing. She said that one of those options was restructuring the debt, which Werle had already covered well. She also said that she never thought she would learn so much about what happened before turning on the tap or what happened after flushing the toilet. Binder said rate increases are a possibility in order to provide the quality service as well as to get back into compliance with the state.

Ruby Brabo began her report by stating she attended Local Government Advisory Committee meeting for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed quarterly meeting. She said during the meeting she learned about HB1822 which was just signed by the Governor. She said the bill allowed for cost sharing for the decommissioning of a waste water treatment plant (WWTP) as well as the rerouting of sewer lines and building new sewer pump stations. Brabo said she also learned about the Governor's Watershed Implementation Plan which included the potential closure of WWTPs that cannot "achieve technology based limits." She said this meant that within the next year and a half to two years, the Service Authority may be forced to close Purkins Corner and Oakland Park WWTPs, much earlier than anticipated. Brabo ended her comments by saying that during the meeting, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noted that no local targets were set because of her efforts.

Mike Bennett began his comments saying that Brabo went to a conference and got helpful information for the Service Authority. He said that her travel shouldn't be controversial but it apparently was. Bennett continued, stating that Brabo had sent a message about the new law and the changes to the grant program regarding the decommissioning of WWTPs. He said that prior to the change, the grant did not cover new pipes but now it does. He noted that new sewer pipes were a huge part of the potential decommissioning of Purkins Corner and Oakland Park WWTPs. He said the law was complicated enough that he wasn't sure how much the Service Authority could get but it sounded like it would range between 35% and 75%. Bennett also said that the information Brabo brought back changed how he looked at the timing of things. He said that prior to the new information, he felt the decommissioning was a long term need but that has changed to a short term need. He again thanked Brabo for the information.

Bennett added that he had a meeting with Wiley Wilson and Draper Aden on March 20th and also visited the Nindes Store well house facility. He said the facility is in terrible shape and he touched the storage tank gently and his fingers came away wet and rusty. Bennett said he wasn't an expert but he felt replacement was the only option. On the 25th, Bennett met with Davenport about the financial needs of the Service Authority. On the 26th he met with Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, and Eric Gregory, County Attorney, and DEQ Enforcement representatives. Bennett said they discussed many issues and solutions and the Service Authority got guidance on a number of things. He said it was a much different atmosphere, in a positive way, than last year's meeting when they negotiated the Consent Order. Bennett said they were still the regulators but things felt much more collegial. He said during the discussion, DEQ shared a story of how the Purkins Corner WWTP was built in the 1990s without any DEQ permit. Bennett said DEQ is still talking about this 20 years later.

On March 27th, Bennett, Binder, and Weakley attended a meeting with Darrel Hertenstein regarding his planned development in the area of Kings Highway (Route 3) and James Madison Parkway (Highway 301), also known as Office Hall. Bennett said the project would include an urgent care facility, housing, and businesses. While the end result isn't known yet, Bennett said he was hopeful the Service Authority would see additional revenue because of the connections. Despite the potential for about $9 million in connection fees, Bennett said the project also raised two key concerns. First, the development would be served by the Purkins Corner WWTP. With this plant being considered for decommissioning, any new development would need to be factored into what Hopyard WWTP could handle. Second, the project includes an access point to Highway 301 which would mean increased access to Service Authority infrastructure by any future development. Thus increasing the need to consider other options for Purkins Corner WWTP, including building a new plant. Bennett said he did not know if that was a feasible option but felt that every option should be considered. Bennett joked that after this meeting, Weakley let him go home for lunch before attending another meeting with Draper Aden in the afternoon. Bennett continued his report joking that Weakley let him work from home on the 28th to participate in a conference call with Davenport. Bennett also attended the budget work session on April 1st. Addressing Kim Dodge, Bennett said he hears her loud and clear. He lives in Fairview Beach and knows how much has to be paid but felt the needs of the Service Authority were gargantuan.

Bennett then said he wanted to offer a rebuttal to comments made by Supervisor Jeff Bueche regarding the privatization of the Service Authority. Bennett said he had called Bueche to tell him about his comments and even offered to send him a copy, to which Bueche declined. Bennett said they had a friendly conversation as they normally do and hoped that after his comments they would still remain friends.

Bennett then read three pages of a prepared statement outlining his reasons for disagreeing with Bueche's statements. To start with, Bennett said he felt a response was needed because some Service Authority employees were concerned that their jobs were now at risk. Bennett said this came on top of years of low morale and that folks were upset. Bennett reassured the employees that there are no current plans to sell the Service Authority and that, in a worst case scenario, if it was sold, the Board of Directors would do everything they could to protect the employees and their jobs. Bennett also wanted to reassure Service Authority customers. He said that if a business were to purchase the utility, the problems would still exist. Pump stations would need to be repaired, the debt would still be there, and the customer base would not dramatically increase. Bennett said because of these factors, he did not see the Service Authority as a sound financial investment for any company. Additionally, as part of a technical review committee last year, Bennett said he and the the rest of the committee were against selling the Service Authority because a new owner would pass along the costs to the customers. Bennett then gave a real world example of a water and sewer company that was recently purchased in a nearby County. He said that the new owners raised rates so much that the County took them to court on behalf of the residents and won. He cautioned that people should be careful what they wish for. Bennett also said that he may agree in principle with Bueche's opinion on the private sector being more efficient than government. However, Bennett said there were certain things were the government excelled and certain things that citizens didn't want a private company to run, such as the military, law enforcement, and fire and rescue. Bennett said it was the job of the Board of Directors to make the Service Authority work and right now they are digging out of a really deep hole. He said the new General Manager, Jonathan Weakley, has been a steady hand on the wheel and has put together  an honest and necessary budget. Bennett said he felt Weakley deserved a chance to turn things around and deserved the support of both Boards. Bennett finished his rebuttal by saying that if, after a reasonable amount of time had passed, things were not moving in the right direction, then as a last resort he would consider selling.

The Consent Agenda was approved.

Next was the Utility Master Plan (Phase I) presentation by Sheryl Stephens of Draper Aden and Ryan Bogese of Wiley Wilson. The presentation was full of information, much of it depressing or scary. Stephens said Draper Aden looked at the water system and all of its associated above-ground parts from well houses to water tanks. She said that after these inspections and visits, they created a list of repairs and their associated cost estimates. Stephens said the repairs were broken down into two parts. Primary Repairs which impacted the health and safety of customers and were violations of regulations. Secondary Repairs were less critical deficiencies they noticed during site visits. The photos in the presentation did not instill confidence with previous management and showed painfully obvious signs of deferred maintenance and repairs. Corroded pipes, rusty storage tanks, and decaying buildings were noted at several locations. In their summary, Draper Aden recommended repairing or replacing three well houses at Bumbrey, Nindes, and Owens. For the recommended system repairs, they broke down the costs for each water system and had a grand total of $50,700 for Primary Repairs and $89,250 for Secondary Repairs. These did not include the estimated cost of $100,000 to $130,000 to repair or replace each of the three suggested well houses. In addition to these recommendations, Draper Aden also said the elevated and ground level tanks needed to be inspected and maintained annually. They also made recommendations based on Virginia Department of Health (VDH) concerns. These suggestions included increased revenue, better capital improvement planning, and regular maintenance and repairs as well as employee training.

Draper Aden was also tasked with looking into the potential costs associated with interconnecting several different water systems. To connect the Circle System to the Courthouse System would cost about $720,000. Connecting the Canterbury System to the Courthouse System would cost $990,000. Connecting the Nindes Store System to the Circle System would cost $3.2 million. Although this connection is already complete, they estimated that connecting the Owens System to the Dahlgren System would cost $252,000.

Moving into the waste water side of the Service Authority, Ryan Bogese took over for Wiley Wilson. Bogese said they were tasked with looking at the Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTPs) and bringing the sewer pump stations up to a DEQ Class 1 Reliability level but were not asked to look at the capacity of WWTPs, future needs, or maintenance costs. Bogese noted that the majority of issues noted by DEQ at the five WWTPs have either already been addressed are are currently in progress. He said the estimated costs for Primary and Secondary Repairs at all of the WWTPs was about $363,900. He did note that the Dahlgren WWTP was the only facility to have dewatering equipment. Werle asked if centrifuges would be used and Bogese said a preliminary engineering report would be needed to determine what would be best. Bogese continued his report and recommended adding one to the Hopyard Farm WWTP, especially due to space and proximity to the landfill, at an estimated cost of $1.9 million to $2.2 million. Regarding the pump stations being brought up to a DEQ Class 1 level, he listed the various options DEQ gave on how to achieve this. As has been discussed in earlier meetings, Bogese repeated that eight pump stations are not in compliance and that five pump stations are within the 100 year flood plain and that two of these stations do not have emergency generators. In estimating the costs, he said the total Primary Repairs would be $762,400 and Secondary Repairs would be $11,400.

Brabo asked if the pump stations were in the flood plain because of the new updates to the flood plain map and Bogese said he didn't know but it was a good possibility. Dr. Young said he looked at the new maps and it would actually add one additional pump station to the numbers given. In other words, they were originally built within the known 100 year flood plain. Bennett commented that he knew where some of them were and it's hard to say they didn't know that when they installed them because they were so close to the water. Weakley added that other jurisdictions have done this as well so it wasn't uncommon. Brabo clarified that the new maps would mean six pumps were within the flood plain and Dr. Young said yes.

Bogese concluded his report by saying they recommended a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) at the eight pump stations in question to determine how best to achieve the Class 1 status. He also recommended evaluating the protection of those pump stations in the flood plain and asking DEQ for a variance on certain items.

Bennett summarized the last bit by saying it would cost about $773 to bring the pump stations into compliance and apparently they had not been in compliance since the dawn of time. He said DEQ was very interested in the pump stations and felt it was embarrassing that the Directors didn't have this information already.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Next was the authorization to sign the Deeds of Dedication for Sections 4 and 15 of Hopyard Farm. Bennett asked why the deeds were dated 2017 and 2018 in some cases to which Gregory responded that he wasn't sure but likely they got signed when the person was available. Gregory said they had no control over that process. Bennett asked to make sure the documents gave easements to the County and the Service Authority and Gregory confirmed that was the case. Gregory said they allowed for fire hydrants, right of way, and turn-arounds among other things. The Board approved the authorization.

Next was the adoption of the Rules and Procedures. Brabo commented that she thought they were already adopted but Gregory said it was just to be safe. The Board adopted the Rules and Procedures. Bennett then said the Amendment to the Rules and Procedures was to allow for participation from a remote location. He said it was the same policy the Board of Supervisors had and that the only change was from "Board of Supervisors" to "Board of Directors." The Board adopted the amendment.

Jonathon Weakley then gave his General Manager's report. On the water side of the Service Authority, Weakley said they were working on updating plans to update their sampling for lead and copper. He thanked Dr. Young and his staff for his help in that process. He also noted the Old King George Elementary School, or Old Old King George High School, would be subject to upcoming inspections and they were working with the School Board. Weakley said the Hopyard Farm repairs have been been scheduled or are already in progress. He said a well went offline in Fairview Beach and a new pump would be installed soon. He said they received complaints of milky water in Cleydael but were not able to find any discoloration. He cautioned that he was not saying they didn't believe the customer. He encouraged customers to sign up for KGAlert and to call if they have a problem. He said the axiom of "see something, say something" applied. Weakley said the Oakland Park system had been flushed and that several alerts were sent via KGAlert.

On the waste water side of the Service Authority, Weakley said a new Operator had been hired at Oakland Park and responses had been sent to DEQ. He said the Dahlgren WWTP was operating on only one effluent pump while the other is being repaired. Weakley said the EQ Basin liner needs to be repaired as well. He also noted that the Commonwealth Governor's School toured both the Dahlgren WWTP and the Fairview Beach well house. Brabo asked for Weakley to go back and see when the Board voted to repair the basin liner and Werle said it was last year for about $120,000. Werle said the repair was because of a large storm. Brabo said never mind to her earlier request. Weakley added that the warranty period for the liner ran out in November of 2018. Weakley continued his report noting several other repairs at other WWTPs as well as attending budget work sessions and holding weekly management meetings.

Bennett asked Weakley if, based on his experience elsewhere, the repairs seen here were typical. Weakley laughed and said it sounded like he was leading the witness. Weakley said there were certainly needs here and the length of the list is what set us apart. He said generally there are Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) where certain things would be funded in advance. He said that if something failed in year four of a five year plan, then at least there was some money already available to make repairs. Weakley said that infrastructure repair is a common theme across the state and felt that the Service Authority was looking at ten years before getting back to normal. He added that the debt isn't addressing what needs to be fixed. He also said the plan for growth is important because if a development is approved today, the pipe doesn't go in the ground tomorrow.

Brabo said that during the interview process, the Board let Weakley know he would be facing a challenge. She said he didn't know how big the challenge would be and said he hasn't turned and ran. Weakley said he appreciated her kind words and said he was committed to the long haul regardless of what it looks like. He added that it really has been a team effort and has never felt isolated. Weakley said everything is shared and that the right solution doesn't have to be his idea. Bennett added that he wanted to echo the comments from Brabo. He also wanted to add that he met Mrs. Weakley and told her it would be a challenge. Mrs. Weakley told Bennett that Mr. Weakley loves a challenge.

The meeting adjourned at 8:01pm.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on April 16, 2019 at 5:15 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

2019-03-27 - King George Track Ribbon Cutting

by Neil Richard

The King George High School track has been open for business for a few months already but today was the official ribbon cutting ceremony. With several dignitaries attending, the ceremony was brief and to the point. Athletic Director Alex Fisher hosted the ceremony with everyone gathering at the far end of the track. School Board Chairman T. C. Collins said a few words, mostly thanking everyone involved in making the project happen. The crowd applauded current and former Coaches, Athletic Directors, School Board Members, County Supervisors, track athletes, parents, and community members.

Matt Boyd, former track and cross-country athlete, returns to King George for a lap around the new track.

Jeff Bueche, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, was also invited to speak a few words. He thanked everyone for attending but said he couldn't take credit for the project and instead thanked Jim Howard, former Supervisor, for being an advocate for the new track surface.

Near the finish, Cathy Binder, Ruby Brabo, and several track athletes give T. C. Collins a challenge.

Fisher then explained that even though there were a lot of competitive people on the track, including those currently on the track team, he wanted to make sure that T. C. Collins, Jeff Bueche, and Jim Howard were at the front of the pack and crossed the finish line first.

Dr. Neiman Young, Matt Boyd, Jim Howard, and Jeff Bueche make it look easy.

As expected, the competitive people took off and Collins barely edged out a win. There were no official results for the non-certified 100 meter race, but based on the photo finish, Ruby Brabo finished second and Cathy Binder tied for fifth. Jim Howard, Jeff Bueche, and Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, took a more leisurely jog across the finish line. A few local residents, School Board members, and former parents took their time walking and enjoyed the new rubberized surface.

Photo courtesy of Gary Butler. Used with permission.

The roughly $1 million project was cash-funded by the County as the old surface was in dire need of repair. The old rubberized surface prior to the newly installed surface was in such bad shape that several sections of the track had worn down to bare asphalt. Local track teams would not run on the surface citing safety concerns, forcing King George to travel to all of their meets. Prior to that old rubberized surface, the original track had a dirt and cinder surface. While this made long track spikes legal, it also made falling more painful.

Photo courtesy of Gary Butler. Used with permission.

Photo courtesy of Gary Butler. Used with permission.
1974 Boys Track Team. Photo courtesy of Cathy Binder. Used with permission.

The old cinder track on display. Photo courtesy of Cathy Binder. Used with permission.

As seen in some of the above pictures, the King George High School track has a long tradition of being an important part of the County's history. It not only serves as a place for student athletes to compete, but also a place for parents, students, and coaches to learn about good sportsmanship.

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

An Interview With Mike Muncie - Local Leaders #5


by Neil Richard


Introduction


The basic idea behind this interview series is to interview local leaders that live, work, or have an important impact on King George County. We have asked various citizens for recommendations on who they see as a local leader. Additionally, we feel that everyone has a story and it deserves to be told. So we want to know their story. As you can see with the questions below, we want to share their  story with the rest of the citizens in King George County. If you have somebody you would like to nominate for a future interview, please contact us.

Mike Muncie, Director of General Properties


Editor's Note:

Much like my earlier interview with Don Smith, Mike Muncie is one of those people that you can sit down and talk to all day if time allowed. I found myself sharing some of my own stories with him during our conversation but have removed them from the article in an effort to focus more on Mike's answers. I also removed some personal information that wasn't pertinent to the questions asked. We also spent some time discussing what type of restaurant King George needs which was also committed. One final note for readers, Mike's interview is very "stream of consciousnesses" in style and therefore may jump around a little. 

Basic Biographical Information


Born in Quantico and lived in King George my whole life other than when I was stationed elsewhere in the Air Force. Education, I graduated from King George High School in 1978. Had pre-enlisted in the Air Force before I graduated. Got out in 1983 and did two years Reserve after that. Some schooling throughout that career. Never did get a degree as far as an Associates or BS. Right now I'm in the second year of a four year apprenticeship for my Journeyman's License in HVAC [Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning]. And then eventually I'll test for my Master's.

Certifications I still hold all of my certifications to inspect in the State of Virginia. Combination Inspector. Plumbing, Electrical, and structural. Erosion and Sediment Control. Never have sat on any Boards or any Committees.

Personal Questions


What do you remember about your grandparents?
Not too much about my dad's side of the family. My dad died when I was five. He was from Terre Haute, Indiana and his father from what I remember, I never remember him but my dad's mother, we weren't around her that much so I don't remember much about her. I know she died when I was in the service.

My mom's father and mother were both from Georgia. We lived with them, because my mom was a single parent after my dad died, so we moved back from Indiana. When my dad got sick, he had a brain tumor, so we went out there for about six months. Then mom had my grandmother come pick us up and we stayed with them. When dad passed away, my mom settled the estate out there and we moved in with my grandparents. We lived there until I was about 12 right there in Dahlgren. Mom worked on the base. Everybody in the family worked on the base except for me.

Both of them, on my mom's side, were from Georgia, lived on farms close to each other, got married when my granddad was 18. He enlisted in the Marine Corps. My grandmother was one of nine children and the matriarch of our family. She was the oldest daughter.

My great-grandmother had nine kids and her husband died so all of the kids had to help out and work the farm. She always instilled that work ethic in us. I used to hate it as a kid but she always said "hard work never killed anybody." We had chickens when we were there in Dahlgren and had a big garden. She'd make you get out there and weed. My granddad worked on the Main Range but he was a like a jack of all trades. He could do anything. But he was a man that didn't show a lot of love. He did but he didn't tell you that he loved you. He showed it in a different way. He'd always be messing round with fruit trees and grafting them. He'd let you help him cut the angles with the pocket knife. It was just a different way of showing you he loved you. He'd take you fishing. He was a great man. He taught me a lot.

What historical events influenced your life the most?
It's kind of hard but the one that sticks out for me is when the Columbia exploded, the Space Shuttle. I remember working in Fredericksburg, I remember when it happened, it was almost like 9/11, you just kind of....I don't know. How it changed my life, I really couldn't tell you but it just made me feel more patriotic I guess. Just glad to be a part of it. It's kind of hard to explain. It impacted my work that day, I can remember what we were doing, and we all just stepped back and the whole day you're talking about and thinking about. I didn't know them but it felt like family. I don't know how to describe it. I don't know if it made me step up my game or not. Shortly after that I went from Carpenter to Lead Carpenter and then to Supervisor. I didn't know anybody but it felt personal. I was in downtown Fredericksburg at the old Princess Anne Hotel remodeling it and was cutting out a doorway to turn it into a reception area. I was shoring up the floor joists to install a beam and that's when I found out.

9/11 was big too. I remember what I was doing when that happened. I was working at Doc Stone in Stafford and had three jobs going up there. I was on top of the Staples, on the roof, with the welder when I heard about it. I kept seeing all these planes flying low and wondered what in the world was going on and finally found out. Heard there was an attack on the Twin Towers.

Outside of work and home, what is your favorite place in King George?
Summertime, I'm out on the river. The Potomac. Usually we go to Betty Lou's Island in Machodoc Creek. We have on Facebook the Machodoc Creek Yacht Club. We'll go out on weekends and sit there and talk and have a good time in the sun. Then we go down to Dockside to have dinner or go to Maryland.

Usually if I'm not doing that I'm at the gym. My son Connor just bought a house so I haven't been to the gym much lately. I've been helping him fix things up there. But at the gym I workout. Do some cardio. At one time I was thinking about entering a competition for weight lifting. I was working towards that but now it's just to maintain and stay off medication.

What person, place, or thing do you think is the most underappreciated in King George County?
It used to be Howard's.

The one that comes to mind right now is Wilmont Landing. We used to go there a lot growing up in high school. Just sit there and party, light a bonfire, you know. But at that point is where three Counties meet. There's King George, Caroline, and Westmoreland. We used to go duck hunting in there too. To me, it's just a real pretty place. I'm sure it has a lot of history. The old brick mill used to be there. There was a brick kiln right there where they'd make the bricks and a barge would come up there. Used to be able to go down there and find a whole brick and it would say WILMONT on them. A lot of them are brittle and broken up but every once in a while you'd find one that's whole.

That's my second answer next to Howard's. I wish we could get a decent restaurant.


Professional Questions


Who is your inspiration or mentor?
I had an answer for that and now I'm just drawing a blank. I would have to say my grandmother. She's no longer here but, you know, she was a very strong woman. Very hard working. Instilled a lot of good things in me I feel. Before we moved out, I think I was about 10, and it was summer time and we wanted to go to the pool on base and she said "come on in here and help me cook." I'd say "Granny I don't want to cook" and she'd say "you're going to need it one day. You're going to be out on your own one day." Stuff like that. And now, to this day, I was married for 19 years and I think I cooked just about every meal. Same thing now. I enjoy cooking. But like I said, she instilled a work ethic in me that's why I do what I do today.

She was always big about education too. She graduated but a lot of her brothers didn't because they had to work on the farm. She wanted all of us to have a better education. She wanted all of us to go to college and Connor was the first. Wish she could be alive to see that. She would have been very proud of him. He was six months old when she died. I should have went to college. I started to do it again when I was married before Connor was born. I started back and my ex-wife Nancy was going to school too and I was going to school and it was just crazy. Finally I just had to give it up. But now nothing's going on so I take a class two nights a week for three hours a night. I get out of class at 9:30pm and get back here by 10:30pm and you're tired but you can't go right to sleep and you get up at 5am.

What is your ideal vision for King George County in the future?
Oh man. I'd like to see it remain somewhat rural like it is now. But I'd like to see the conveniences that we have like the Walmart and a few other places. I think infrastructure is a big one. And I'd like to see some people start building some more schools because I think we're going to be overwhelmed when these approved subdivisions are actually filled up. I don't think we're preparing enough for that.

By infrastructure I mean the roads, especially around and by the Courthouse. Water and sewer. The roads. Some of these roads, you know like 206 [Dahlgren Road] is unreal. Very scary. I try to avoid it as much as I can. Another fire station. And I would love to see General Properties, one day, have more skilled employees. Instead of outsourcing all the stuff like HVAC and plumbing, which we do a lot of plumbing in house, but something big. Electrical, we try to maintain in house but again, if it's big like feeder work. But if I had the licensed people, then I could actually do the in house work. I know that's how Spotsylvania operates but that would be a big budget item. Salaries would have to go way up. But I really think in the long run you would save money.

What do you feel are the top 3 issues to address in King George?
Service Authority. I think they do a good job with what they're given. All the other issues, the debt, how it was accumulated. I'd like to see us get out from under that.

Probably 206 [Dahlgren Road]. That's terrible.

The bridge [Highway 301 over the Potomac River] and the traffic but we don't have any control over that.

What do you feel are the top 3 successes in King George?
I know a lot of people will disagree with me but the dump. It's a big money maker for the County. I know one day it's going to shut down but I think it's helped the County a lot as far as revenue. I mean, look at the fire trucks. All the rescue equipment and the Sheriff's office, all of their stuff is top notch. When I came out of the Air Force in 1983, I joined the volunteers and everything we did up there we worked for. Yard sales, fund drives, we never got money from the County. So I think that's a plus.

Another one people may not agree with is Walmart. It's definitely eliminated a lot of trips to town. But there again, it brings a lot of riff-raff from across the bridge. I've heard this several times, "if you build a Walmart, they will come," meaning other businesses. Which would be good for the County as far as tax base. I think you could concentrate all that growth in one spot and you're all right. You start spreading it out all around the County and you start loosing site of what you really like, the rural nature. I think once the bridge goes in, the corridor through there will blow up.

I think the new field house that we built at the high school is another one. I think the County needed it. I know there was a lot of talk about using The Pit but I think it was something that was well needed.

What person, place, or thing do you think we lack in King George?
A home cooking style restaurant. I would say a competitive gym, something other than the YMCA. There's Anytime Fitness but it's not a full one. But it's not for somebody that wants to come in and do some heavy lifting. And I know they have a Cross Fit up there but it's not the same style as what I'm talking about. Usually a body builder would do lighter weights and more reps but at some point you have to lift heavy. So the YMCA is about it right now.

Going back to the home cooking restaurant, my go-to for a home cooked meal for breakfast is fried eggs, sausage, grits, biscuits and gravy. Lunchtime would be fried chicken, mashed potatoes. Dinner would probably be meatloaf, greens. But it's the comfort foods.

Friday, March 29, 2019

OPINION - A Sea Of Red For Education

by Neil Richard

The Lewis Egerton Smoot Library was in the hot seat during the last Supervisors' budget work session with County leaders looking for answers on why the library needed more than the level funding they got last year. This budget work session turned the tables on the Supervisors and put them in the hot seat with a standing room only crowd challenging their previous statements regarding school funding. With educators, paraprofessionals, volunteers, parents, and School Board members in the audience, many of them wearing "Red for Ed," the Supervisors endured an hour of public comment. About twenty people spoke, some crying from raw emotion, stating their support for funding the school's request for more money this year. Several speakers even said an increase in tax was okay with them.

Another 10 or 20 people arrived after this photo.

With so many members of the public in attendance, some arriving after the School Board meeting, and many in the hallways outside the meeting room, it was difficult to get an accurate count. My best guess is at least 70 people were there. It was also hard to keep count of how many people spoke during public comment as the simple task of making tally marks couldn't compete with the numerous compelling stories from teachers. A few highlights from the public comment session included a teacher saying they were "fed up with the lip service" and wanted the Supervisors to fund the schools. Many repeated that it was not about dollars and cents, a reference to Jeff Bueche's earlier comments from the joint meeting the Supervisors held with the School Board. Some reminded the Supervisors that the budget presented by Dr. Benson, Superintendent, was already cut and that those cuts were needs, not wants. One teacher said she requested additional positions at each school in the district because they were needed. She had data to validate her request yet the needed positions were not included in the budget that was presented to the Supervisors. One speaker summed things up by saying "as a parent and a para, please fund this."

Having caught wind of a large crowd coming to speak, a Sheriff's Deputy was present. In the last two years, even during last year's shouting match, there have never been deputies present at a budget work session to provide security. Thankfully the crowd was largely polite and professional but it showed that many had not attended a public meeting like this before.  With public comment winding down, Jeff Bueche said that the Supervisors had planned to fund both the teacher raises and the requested Special Education positions.

Each Supervisor then commented, starting with Ruby Brabo saying her intent was not to discredit Dr. Benson during his presentation. Cathy Binder commented that she had been in the rooms of many of those that spoke, taught kids from others that spoke, and had done the work of many of them in the room. Richard Granger reminded everyone that the Board of Supervisors has the authority to fund the schools, but does not have the authority to govern how those funds are spent. John Jenkins said his line of questions during Dr. Benson's presentation wasn't intended to be rude but to rather find out the cost of the Special Education positions because he wanted to make sure they were funded. Jeff Bueche encouraged everyone to stay for the rest of the meeting and to attend future meetings to stay involved in the process. None of the Supervisors mentioned that all other County employees received salary raises over the past two years. Although it was included in the handouts during the meeting, it wasn't mentioned by anyone that the Supervisors would also receive a pay raise, going from $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year. School Board members also requested a raise this year in an effort to go from their current base pay $3,000 per year up to $5,000 per year.

After nearly 90 minutes, and a short recess, the Supervisors got back to their Agenda and heard from Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator. Dr. Young said his revenue projections for next year showed the County's predicted income at $85,242,365. When compared to the County's projected expenses of $85,833,237, this left a gap of $590,872 to cover. Dr. Young gave the Board three options; raise taxes three cents, use the Revenue Stabilization Fund, or reduce the local contribution amount to the schools. Even though a one cent real estate tax increase (per $100 of assessed value) equates to roughly $270,000, the need to raise it to three cents would be cover the full amount and note leave the County short. It was also noted that due to the landfill revenue funding capital projects, the tax rate is artificially 27 cents lower. In addition to that, the County has already leveraged roughly 20 years of landfill revenue out of the remaining 26 years of life. Historically, the real estate tax rate ranged between 72 cents and 77 cents from 1996, roughly when the landfill opened, to 2005, shortly before the housing market crashed. Since 2009, when the tax rate was 50 cents, the rates have seen two spikes; 2014 saw a six cent increase and 2016 saw a seven cent raise.

There was some discussion during the budget summary about raising tax rates versus giving teachers raises. When discussion turned to the need for the schools to separate their Human Resources and Finance Officers from the County, Brabo said that previous Supervisors had forced the school to combine with the County. She suggested writing a letter to Dr. Benson to explain that the County would no longer offer these services to the schools and be penalized on their compliance audit and thus, the schools would need to hire the staff needed to complete the work. Several Supervisors said, at this point in the meeting and earlier in the evening, that the County gives the schools money but it's up to the schools to decide how to spend it. While that may be true, it puts the burden on the School Board for deciding between a pay raise for teachers and funding mandated Special Education positions.

In looking at previous meetings and presentations, it was interesting to find that some Supervisors weren't very supportive last year to fund the schools either. The School Resource Officers (SROs) was a big point of contention during at least two different meetings, even though the schools didn't specifically request them and the funding comes out of the Sheriff's budget, not the school budget. Additionally, the schools had a year-over-year reduction in projected expenditures of about $28,000 and they asked for an incredibly small increase in local funding last year of only $303,728.

At the end of the evening, there were a few topics on the Agenda that were pushed to the next Board meeting. The Personal Property Tax Relief Act funding was cut to 30%. But the key point on the Board fully funding the school funding request was left unanswered. A few Supervisors wanted a few more details to be answered before making a final decision.

Thursday, March 28, 2019

OPINION - 2019-03-22 - Jeff Bueche Town Hall Notes

by Neil Richard

Jeff Bueche once again held a Town Hall for the residents of his district, James Monroe, as well as the entire County of King George. With the strong storms that came through just an hour before the meeting, the location changed at the last minute due to a power outage at Caledon State Park. Bueche instead hosted his meeting at the Fairview Beach Fire House.

As with his previous Town Halls (a list is below), Bueche invited T. C. Collins, School Board Chairman, and Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, to attend. Also invited was Vic Mason, Clerk of the Court. Bueche said the main goal for the evening's discussion was to talk about the infrastructure needs in the County. He listed a few, including broadband internet, a new Courthouse, and medical facilities.

The discussion circled around these topics, along with the water and sewer needs, affordable housing needs, and what to do with vacant buildings. When talking about the vacant buildings, one of which is the old King George Middle School, the discussion quickly grew heated when talk turned to the recent news about the School Board budget request.

Bueche defended and repeated many of his comments and opinions from earlier Supervisor meetings but a few in the audience, and at the head table, disagreed. While not necessarily arguing with each other, it was clear that Collins and Bueche had very different ideas on how much funding the school should receive. It could be argued that Bueche's biggest gaffe of the evening was suggesting that the band students sell chocolate bars to raise funds for their uniforms. Collins, and others in the audience, felt troubled by the suggestion. A mumbled suggestion to cut the Supervisor's travel budget instead drew at least one chuckle from the audience.

The evening wasn't filled with all negative news though. The audience did have suggestions for solving financial and infrastructure issues in the County. Bueche said he, Dr. Young, and Cathy Binder toured the Westmoreland Courthouse recently and saw a lot of promise in using a similar building design in King George. Although Mason said the needs of King George would not be the same as Westmoreland, it did sound like some of the features in the Westmoreland Courthouse were similar to his needs in King George.

Other audience suggestions included bringing back fundraisers for the Fire and Rescue Department, selling the old Middle School, and making the Service Authority part of a public utilities department. In what felt like the biggest surprise of the evening, the Service Authority was not discussed as much as expected however there was some healthy debate over the positives and negatives of privatizing the Service Authority versus turning it into a County department. There was also some discussion on the history of the Service Authority and how it had acquired so much debt.

As I am a member of the Landfill Advisory Committee, the most interesting suggestion for me during the evening was to reserve the last few cells of the landfill for only King George County trash. By limiting what goes into those cells to only trash from residents, it would ensure a longer lifespan for the benefit of dumping trash for free. I don't know if this would be possible but I feel that it's a good idea to look into. The cost to dispose of trash and recyclables is rising in many areas, including places in our region, so if we could preserve that benefit for residents, it is certainly worth looking at.

Dr. Young had the most interesting question of the evening, asking what percentage of expenses should be for the schools. I was the only one to accept the challenge and answer. Other interesting topics discussed included the possible expansion of the Career Technical Education (CTE) program. Some in the audience gave great anecdotal evidence on how a CTE program had a positive impact on their lives but had very little financial impact on the schools. Also discussed was how to handle existing properties owned by the County but sitting unused. Some in the audience suggested selling them while others felt rehabilitating them was necessary.

After two and a half hours, it was clear that the bulk of the conversation was finished. It is unclear how many of the suggestions will be put into practice but it was good to hear that some residents cared enough to have ideas. While the conversation on funding educational needs got a little heated at times, the rest of the evening was full of a civil and productive discussion.

Previous Town Halls hosted by Jeff Bueche:

[2019-03-28 - Updated to include a link to the December 14, 2018 Town Hall.]