Local Leader Interviews

Click here for a list of all the interviews with #localleaders.
Showing posts with label kgcsa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kgcsa. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

2020-04-29 - Service Authority Public Notice

The King George County Service Authority is holding a public hearing. This public hearing is to confirm FY2020/21 Rates; amend certain charges during the Local Emergency for COVID-19; and address regulatory amendments to certain late charges, penalties and interest during an emergency.

The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, May 19th, 2020 at 5:30p.m. The hearing will be held in the Board Room. Those wishing to provide written comments concerning the proposed budget may provide comments via email or by mail.

Email comments to jweakley@co.kinggeorge.state.va.us or mail your written comments to:

King George County Service Authority, General Manager
10459 Courthouse Drive, Suite 200
King George, VA 22485

Any questions regarding the proposed budget may be directed to the General Manager’s Office. (540) 775-2746, Monday through Friday, 8:00a.m. to 4:00p.m.

Click image to make larger.

SUBSCRIBE OR DONATE
You can subscribe via email here. You can make a charitable donation here.

Friday, March 27, 2020

2020-03-17 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The King George County Service Authority held their March 17th meeting in the Board Room as normal however they adhered to new guidelines on social distancing by sitting further apart from each other. This meant that only some members sat at the dais while others sat at tables arranged around the room. Additionally, the Board of Directors encouraged members of the public to not attend. While they have been broadcasting their meetings on GoToMeeting, the audio quality has largely been sub-optimal. Over the past few months they have worked towards broadcasting via YouTube Live and the results have been encouraging. You can view the video here. The meeting began at 5:31pm.

Watching meetings from your living room may be the new normal.

Friday, February 28, 2020

2020-02-18 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority began their regular meeting at 5:32pm.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

Jim Morris and Allen Parker had no report.

Annie Cupka said the only thing she had to report was that she attended the budget work session on the 13th and thanked Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, and his staff for the work in putting everything together.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

2020-02-04 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors began their meeting a few minutes later than normal as they waited for Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, and Eric Gregory, County Attorney pro tempore, to arrive. The meeting began at 5:36pm. Dr. Young would arrive about five minutes later.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

Jim Morris reported that he met with Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, and other Service Authority staff on the 27th.

Allen Parker had no report.

Annie Cupka said she was still looking for a citizen to serve on the Service Authority Budget Advisory Committee.

Tuesday, January 28, 2020

2020-01-21 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority began their first full meeting of the year at 5:31pm.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

Kim Dodge was the only person to speak during Public Comment. She said she has spoken before about the paying the water and sewer bills and just wanted the Service Authority to know that customers that do have to pay both, it's high for them. Dodge said it was a hardship on families with a lot of children, stay at home moms, and those with only one source of income. She knew they were getting into budget season and that there are infrastructure problems that cost money but she wanted to speak up for all customers.

Monday, January 13, 2020

2020 Board of Supervisors, Service Authority, and Wireless Authority Meeting Dates

Listed below are the regular meeting dates for the King George County Board of Supervisors and Service Authority Board of Directors for the remainder of 2020. Regular Service Authority meetings will be held at 5:30 p.m., and Board of Supervisors meetings will begin at approximately 6:30 p.m. All meetings will be held in the Board Room of the Revercomb Building, 10459 Courthouse Drive, King George, VA 22485, unless otherwise advertised. [EDITOR'S NOTE: The biggest change from the 2019 calendar is the start time for each meeting and the addition of the July 14, 2020 meeting.]

Thursday, January 9, 2020

2020-01-07 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The King George County Service Authority Board of Directors opened their first meeting of 2020 at 6:43pm. Within a short ten minutes, they completed their short Agenda.

Cathy Binder was elected as Chair and Annie Cupka was elected as Vice Chair. Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, was elected as the Board's Secretary and Treasurer. They approved a meeting calendar that mirrored the previously agreed upon schedule for the Supervisors and added the same July 14, 2020 meeting date. They also agreed to meet earlier in the evening at 5:30pm. The Board approved their standard Rules and Ethics documents and there was no Public Comment.

Monday, December 23, 2019

2019-12-17 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Board of Directors for the King George County Service Authority opened their last meeting of the year at 6:30pm. With roughly 80 people already in the room for the upcoming Public Hearing later in the evening, the Board did their best to move things along quickly.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment. Mike Bennett said if it sounded like he was rushing the audience, he was doing it for them. He was implying that he was trying to get through their business as quickly as possible.

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

2019-12-03 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

Some of the King George County Service Authority Board of Directors had to do some gentle pushing to make their way into the Board Room before the meeting began. The overflowing audience was there in large part to voice their support for the upcoming Second Amendment Sanctuary proposal at the Board of Supervisors meeting later.


The meeting opened at 6:30pm with a resoundingly loud Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Michael Bennett said that Ruby Brabo would be a few minutes late. He then joked that he was happy to see so many people excited to hear about water and sewer which garnered laughs from the audience.

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

2019-11-19 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The King George County Service Authority Board of Directors opened their sole November meeting at 6:30pm.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

Christopher Werle was absent and Richard Granger had no report.

Cathy Binder said she would try to keep her report brief and said she did a lot of things over the past few weeks. She thanked Ruby Brabo for letting her attend the Waterways Tour in the Northern Neck and enjoyed learning how the nutrients impact the waterways and their harvest. Binder also met with Lisa Hull about potential tourism opportunities. While at the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo), Binder attended several seminars including one about the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP3). As somebody without a science degree, Binder said it was very helpful. Binder said she's also been doing a lot of research over the last week and a half and said that there really isn't an origin story for the Service Authority. She found a lot of history as has Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, but she wanted to call attention to one document she found from December 1992. Binder said that the previous stories about the state mandating the County take over the water and sewer systems seems to be incorrect and that the Board of Supervisors at the time actually voted to take it over.

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

OPINION - Purkins Corner Work Session

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors and the Board of Supervisors held a joint work session on September 19, 2019 to discuss a single issue; the future of the Purkins Corner Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). For those that don't know, the Service Authority is slowly recovering from years of mismanagement and poor financial decisions. While the County also has a large amount of debt to deal with, it has a much larger tax base when compared to the customer base of the Service Authority.

Because both boards are separate entities but some members sit on both, the meeting was a little awkward when everyone was arriving and finding a place to sit. Once everyone was settled in, and both groups opened their meetings, Mike Bennett, the Chair of the Service Authority Board of Directors said that Jonathon Weakley, Service Authority General Manager, was sick and would not be attending. Weakley, despite having strep throat and a high fever, managed to compile a presentation of the current situation at Purkins Corner.

Weakley's presentation, given by Bennett, was a solid overview of what most everyone at the table already knew. The WWTP was old and not functioning well. It had already been under Consent Orders from Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Although not included, Purkins Corner was under a DEQ Consent Order from 2006 to 2008, from 2011 to 2012, and again in 2014. This doesn't include the current Consent order that has been in place since last year. Aside from the DEQ enforcement issues, the plant has outlived its useful life and isn't running as efficiently as a newer plant.

Friday, September 20, 2019

2019-09-17 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors began their meeting promptly at 6:30pm.

There was an amendment to the Agenda to include an action item to consider the formation of a committee to review the Pump Station Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) and to review Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Grants. The amendment was approved.

Public Comment opened with Adam Taylor speaking about how he was recently without water. He said that there was likely some sort of oversight from the previous owner and water was shut off at his house. He said he called the Service Authority but it was after hours. When he called the after hours number, which was the Sheriff's Office, they refused to contact the on-call technicians to attempt to resolve the issue. He said that Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, was able to eventually help him resolve the issue and he was thankful for that. However, he didn't think it was right that he wasn't connected to the on-call employees.

Linda Peterson was next to come to the podium but when she began speaking against the proposed campground with a gun range, Mike Bennett, Chair, told her that the comments would be better made to the Board of Supervisors. Bennett said it wasn't that they weren't interested it was just that the Service Authority didn't have any jurisdiction over that issue.

In an unusual move, Bennett gave the audience a preview of Chris Werle's board report saying it was a "commercial for a coming attraction." He encouraged everyone to pay special attention to this one even though it was a bit of an unusual report.

Werle then began his report by saying he wasn't sure he could live up to that introduction but did have some things that were important to say. He apologized for being a little longer than normal. Werle said that on September 4th, he met with Weakley about the Wiley-Wilson report as it relates to the Purkins Corner Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). He said that Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) wants to shut down older, underperforming WWTPs in favor of newer ones that are more effective and efficient. Werle said that Purkins Corner and Oakland Park are being targeted and that the Wiley-Wilson report included part of the Draper Aden report which studied the cost and logistics of decommissioning both plants and rerouting waste to Hopyard Farm. Werle said that before any decision is made by the Board of Directors, they should carefully consider the technology available, the cost and funding available, the impact of future debt, availability of land, and more.

Werle then gave his recommendation on what he feels is the most feasible solution. First, Werle suggested replacing the Purkins Corner WWTP with a new 500,000 gallon per day (gpd) plant. He felt that building a smaller, 250,000 gpd, plant and then later expanding it would not be cost effective. He said the estimated cost for this is about $12 million with another $1 million for a dewatering facility. Werle's second suggestion was to work with DEQ to delay the decommissioning of Oakland Park WWTP to allow the Service Authority to grow the Capital Improvement Fund. He said DEQ should be amenable to this as Service Authority staff have impressed DEQ with the amount of work they've done to the facility as well as the plant's improved nutrient numbers. Third, Werle said that when the Oakland Park WWTP does get decommissioned, the waste should be rerouted to Hopyard Farm. Werle said building a new plant in Oakland Park would not be possible due to the limited land area. He estimated the cost for decommissioning and pumping the waste to Hopyard at $5 million. Werle's fourth recommendation was, when the Oakland Park WWTP is decommissioned, to upgrade Hopyard Farm WWTP to a 500,000 gpd facility. He said this would cost about $4 million plus another $1 million for the dewatering plant. Finally, Werle recommended the Service Authority fund the roughly $23 million in new construction needed through DEQ Water Quality Improvement Fund (WQIF) grants, developer connection fees, economic development funds, and other sources.

Werle then changed topics and went back to his report. On the 4th he received confirmation that the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Fairview Beach Riverbank Stabilization Project was received by FEMA and it stated no impact was found for the vetch, a plant similar to soybeans, and the Northern Long Eared Bats. Werle said the US Fish and Wildlife Service had no more comments or concerns and that they were now waiting for the National Marine Fisheries Service to make a determination on the impact, if any, to the Short Nose Sturgeon. He said once that was done, there should be a permit issued for wetlands disturbance. Werle ended his report stating he attended the Economic Development Authority (EDA) presentation on how to retain rural characteristics on the 12th.

Richard Granger began his report by thanking everyone for speaking. He apologized to Taylor for his experience and said he would reach out to see if he could find out more about the issue. Granger then thanked Werle for his information and effort and being involved with everything. He said he agreed with him, especially with the sizing of a Purkins Corner replacement that would allow for future development.

Cathy Binder also thanked Taylor for speaking. She said she's been involved with a lot of the Wiley-Wilson reports and what the options are and has been doing a lot of research on the issue lately.

Ruby Brabo said on the 6th she was reappointed by the Governor to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed committee and that the County's participation was important, especially as it relates to Phase III of the state's Watershed Improvement Plan (WIP). On the 16th she sent information to Bennett and Weakley about a potential grant to purchase generators for the pump stations. She said Werle was investigating the grants and that he's done a great job in the past on FEMA grants.

Mike Bennett said he didn't really have a report but promised to look into Taylor's issue. He thanked Werle for his analysis and said the Board of Directors would meet with the Supervisors later in the week. Bennett said the grant information from Brabo would be helpful.

The Consent Agenda was approved.

Bennett noted that the $832,000 item is for debt repayment saying he just wanted to point that out.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Next was the amended section to consider the formation of a committee to review the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) in regards to the pump stations noted in the Wiley-Wilson report. Additionally, the committee would review the FEMA grant to see if the projects were eligible. Weakley said it was a time sensitive issue as the grant cycle closes in November and that he recommended meeting once or twice a week. The Board approved appointing Bennett, Werle, and Weakley to the committee.

Werle added some comments based on some information he was able to gather within the last few hours about the FEMA grants being discussed. He said it was part of FEMA's Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program and that generators are eligible, however they need to be permanent, not portable. Bennett said the draft Wiley-Wilson report only called for one portable one so that shouldn't be an issue. Werle added that generators are low in priority for getting grants and that none had been awarded in Virginia for sewer pump stations. He said that projects to elevate components were also eligible however the Wiley-Wilson report recommended replacing the pumps and that would not be eligible. Werle said that another important point to keep in mind was that the grants are approved and announced in December 2020. He cautioned though that the grants are not reimbursements, meaning the Service Authority wouldn't be able to complete the projects now and then get repaid later. Brabo suggested that out of the dozen generators needed, maybe the ones eligible for the grant could be placed at the bottom of the list. Bennett added that many of the pump stations in question are in a 100 year flood plain. However, because 100 year floods only happen once every 100 years, these projects are ranked as the lowest priority often times.

Jonathan Weakley, General Manager, then gave a brief report where he apologized to Taylor for his experience and promised to follow-up with him later. He also shared that the Circle well house was getting repairs this month and that KGAlerts would be sent when customers are impacted. Weakley said that the recent storms impacted Hopyard and Dahlgren Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTP) and several parts had to be replaced. He said they would need to review what spare parts are left and what would need to be ordered and also said an insurance claim would be filed. Weakley said he received the draft pump station report from Wiley-Wilson and shared with the Directors.

Jonathon Weakley, Service Authority General Manager, shares nutrient levels from the Dahlgren Waste Water Treatment Plant.

Weakley also shared updates on the nutrient loads at each WWTP. Every facility was under permit and grant limits for Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) in August. He said he was confident Purkins Corner WWTP would be under the limit for the year. Bennett interjected saying the Board asked for this data, including prior year information. Bennett said that the August 2018 amounts were shortly after AQUA took over and that the Service Authority was now below that and trending in the right direction. Weakley said he appreciated his comments and he would pass it on to staff. He said the staff has been working on getting things done on a daily basis and he just checks in with them. Weakley gave kudos to the staff at Purkins Corner for their efforts in piping certain areas to get better TN and TP numbers. He said he was also working with the Navy in Dahlgren on chemical procurement. He said he would share more information as it became available. Weakley said he wasn't saying it would or would not work, just that he was working on the details before bringing forward a recommendation.

The Board then went into Closed Session at 7:08pm and invited Weakley, Dr. Neiman Young (County Administrator), Jeff Bueche (Board of Supervisors), John Jenkins (Board of Supervisors), and Chris Pomeroy (Aqua Law) to attend. Dr. Young didn't join until 7:35pm and Weakley and Gregory didn't join until 7:51pm. Bueche and Jenkins left at 8:22pm and there was a collective groan from the audience when nobody else left the meeting. The rest of the Board returned from Closed Session at 8:32pm and the adjourned the meeting. While a long meeting, this was not the longest one this year (that one adjourned at 8:57pm).

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on September 19, 2019 at 6:30 pm at Company 1 Headquarters.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.

SUBSCRIBE OR DONATE
You can subscribe via email here. You can make a charitable donation here.

Monday, September 9, 2019

2019-09-03 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

SUBSCRIBE OR DONATE
You can subscribe via email here. You can make a charitable donation here.

The Board of Directors of the Service Authority began their meeting at 6:31 pm.

It was noted that Ruby Brabo could not attend physically but was participating remotely. Eric Gregory, County Attorney, reminded Mike Bennett, Chairman, that the Board needed to make a motion to approve and recognize Brabo before she could officially participate. The Board did so.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

Monday, August 26, 2019

2019-08-20 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors began their meeting at 6:31 pm. Mike Bennett, Chairman, asked everyone to speak into their microphones so everyone could be heard.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.

Christopher Werle and Richard Granger had no report.

Cathy Binder said she had a nasty head cold and apologized if she had to stop speaking early. She said she met with Wiley Wilson about the decommissioning of the Purkins Corner Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) and the potential for replacing it. Binder said there was a new wrinkle with the nutrient credits for the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. She said there was a limited amount for each river and the Board will do the best they can for King George.

Ruby Brabo added onto Binder's comments saying that she and Penny Gross from Fairfax County raised the issue of nutrient credits and how it didn't make sense to overload one section of water and have no impact. On the 15th and 16th, Brabo attended a Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) meeting. She said the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has chosen to implement stricter requirements than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in regards to WWTPs in Phase III of the Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP). She said this would be costly to King George and others and that the reductions in Nitrogen and Phosphorus are not achievable nor realistic. Brabo said VACo has already sent a letter opposing the drafted plan. She asked for the Board's consensus to send a similar letter to Governor Ralph Northam and to send a copy of said letter to Secretary of Natural Resources Matthew Strickler. She said it took all of the voices to ensure that local targets were not set and felt this was a similar situation where a unified voice may help. Consensus was reached. [Editor's Note: The final Phase III plan was released 3 days later on August 23, 2019. Jeff Bueche mentioned Phase III in his May 7, 2019 Board report as well as in his response to our questions on his travel expenses.]

Mike Bennett began his report thanking Brabo as well as Binder and others for attending conferences and bringing information back to the rest of the Board. He appreciated the helpful info and said these are the things that they need to get ahead of. On the 13th he attended the meeting with Wiley Wilson with Binder and said they also discussed building a new WWTP at Purkins Corner instead of sending the waste to Hopyard Farm WWTP. He said that the more they talk with the engineering firm the more they realize how complex the issue is. On the 16th he met with Darrell Hertenstein who is proposing a development that would use the Purkins Corner WWTP. He said the Purkins Corner facility currently has a a capacity of about 200 more Equitable Residential Units (ERUs) and said the Service Authority wouldn't be able to sign off on any development that would need more than that. Bennett said that the 200 ERUs left did not include the 10 or 15 ERUs that were set aside for any potential need at a new Courthouse building. He said he talked to Supervisor Jeff Bueche about the two Boards meeting to work out their needs. Bennett said the presentation later tonight was the first part of that but there were many complex factors involved.

 The Consent Agenda was approved.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Ryan Bogese, Senior Engineer for Wiley Wilson, gave the Board an informational presentation on the potential cost differential between decommissioning and upgrading the Purkins Corner Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). Bogese said that to decommission both Oakland Park and Purkins Corner WWTPs would cost $9.7 million. To pump the waste from just Oakland Park to Hopyard Farm WWTP is $5.1 million and the general feeling on the Board was that this was a predetermined solution as DEQ will eventually require the closure of the facility and there is no room to upgrade or expand the plant. With Purkins Corner WWTP however, the Board will need to decide which solution is best, decommissioning or upgrading. With enough property to build a new facility at Purkins Corner and to account for potential development in the future, the Board wanted price points on the options.

Bogese said that with a new plant in Purkins Corner, there is another choice to make with the size of the facility. Building a 250,000 gallon per day (gpd) WWTP has more cost up front due to the infrastructure needs but the 500,000 gpd WWTP would be cheaper in the long run. Bennett and Weakley said that if the larger facility is built, the Board should consider the amount of development. Essentially, they said that if the larger WWTP is built and the planned development doesn't happen, then the Service Authority would have wasted money on paying for the extra capacity. Brabo asked if the developments that have already been approved have been factored into the demand that would be placed on Purkins Corner and Weakley said he was working with Community Development to see which of the approved plans were within the Purkins Corner service area.

There was also some discussion about the nutrient loads for both the Potomac River and the Rappahannock River. Being bounded on both sides by Virginia, and being smaller, the Rappahannock River has fewer nutrient credits available and has an increased chance of less credits in the future. Bogese said the nutrient credits could not be purchased in advance and stockpiled and that the state was in charge of distributing them. With Purkins Corner WWTP being in the Potomac River watershed, the general feeling was that pumping waste to Hopyard would cause some potential issues since it is located in the Rappahannock River watershed. Bogese also said that the storm water credits the County had purchased were different than the nutrient credits being discussed.

The bottom line of the presentation from Bogese was the cost difference between the different options on the table. The first option, to pump Purkins Corner waste to Hopyard Farm WWTP, which would require an upgrade at the Hopyard facility, would cost between $7.4 and $8.6 million. The second option, to replace the Purkins Corner WWTP with a 250,000 gpd facility, would cost between $7.1 and $10.2 million. The third option, to replace the Purkins Corner WWTP with a 500,000 gpd facility, would cost between $9.9 and $14.1 million. Bennett said, based on the costs given, that regardless of which option they took it would cost between $7.1 and $8.6 million.

Jonathan Weakley then gave his General Manager's report. Weakley said the Purkins Corner water tank has been painted and is being filled with water. He said once the water passes quality testing, it will be placed back into service. Weakley said the Oakland Park tank is currently being painted. He said lead and copper sampling letters and kits had gone out to homeowners participating in the program and that the Walnut Hill developer has a few items to correct before the Service Authority took ownership of the infrastructure. He told the Board that the meter reading software and hardware will no longer be supported after 2021 so he would be submitting a capital request to replace those. Regarding the WWTPs, he said that Dahlgren is operating within permit requirements but is still not under the limit for the grant. The only other facility to be outside of the permit limits is Purkins Corner. Weakley said repairs had also begun on the UV system at Dahlgren. Bennett asked how many items were left on the Consent Order from DEQ and Weakley said only a couple of items. Bennett asked about closing out the Consent Order and opening a new one with just those remaining items and Weakley said that had been discussed with DEQ but wasn't sure if it was the best solution yet. Weakley also said he had a conference call with Davenport regarding the debt refinancing and said that Federal law required a $50,000 draw down. He apologized to the Board for the late notice on this unexpected draw down but said he only just learned about it.

With that, the Board then went into Closed Session at 7:23 pm and invited Gregory, Young, and Weakley to attend.

While they were behind closed doors, Supervisor Jeff Bueche noticed that the King George County flag was hung on the pole upside down. After some searching, he and IT Director Chris Dines found some tools to correct the issue. After some discussion with Deputy Shriver, they also rearranged all three flags to display them correctly.

Despite being displayed right-side-up two weeks ago, the County flag was upside-down.

Chris Dines and Jeff Bueche work to correct the error.

The County flag now facing the right way.

All three flags now properly displayed.

The Board returned from Closed Session and adjourned immediately thereafter at 8:00 pm.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on September 3, 2019 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.

SUBSCRIBE OR DONATE

You can subscribe via email here. You can make a charitable donation here.

Thursday, July 18, 2019

2019-07-16 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors held a special meeting on July 16, 2019. The meeting was held at the County's Fire, Rescue, and Emergency Services Company 1 while the Board Room was being renovated. The meeting began at 6:32pm.

Shortly after the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance, Mike Bennett, Chair, made sure the doors were not locked so members of the public could get into the meeting.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

There was no Public Comment.


Christopher Werle reported that he attended the joint work session with the Board of Supervisors and the Economic Development Authority (EDA) on June 20th. He also attended a meeting on June 28th with Hazel Homes to discus the potential capacity of Hopyard Farm Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) as well as the potential increase in flow from Oakland Park WWTP should the facility be decommissioned.

Richard Granger reported that he attended the joint meeting on June 20th as well.

Cathy Binder also said she attended the joint meeting on June 20th as well as other meetings with Bennett who could probably provide a better update than her.

Mike Bennett reported he attended the joint meeting as well. He also attended a meeting regarding the Potomac Landing development on June 21st and went to the Town Hall hosted by Jeff Bueche on June 27th. At the Town Hall, he said that Yvonne Richard shared information about several potential grants that could be used at Ralph Bunche that would help the Ralph Bunche Arts and Humanities Center with their project as well as help the Service Authority increase their service in the area. Bennett said he asked Weakley to look into the grant programs. Bennett said he attended the meeting with Hazel Homes on the 28th and participated in a conference call on July 1st with Schnabel Engineering and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Bennett said Schnabel will be conducting the Environmental Analysis (EA) for the riverbank stabilization project instead of FEMA because they can do it faster. He said Schnabel is running into a few issues with other agencies not wanting to believe they have FEMA approval to do the EA. Also on July 1st, Bennett attended a joint meeting with Naval Support Facility Dahlgren, King George County, and the Service Authority. Bennett said the idea behind the meeting was to see how the three entities could join forces in certain areas. As an example, he said with the purchasing of chemicals, they could get a better price. He did say that the base would continue to operate their water and waste water facilities. Bennett said the Service Authority was a small part of the discussion but he felt the idea was sound enough to consider including Colonial Beach, Fort A. P. Hill, and Caroline County to increase savings. He said it may also serve as a template of cooperation with the base with regards to other issues and that it may take six months to a year before any project is brought to fruition. On July 15th, Bennett met with the Hampton Roads Sanitary District and Tri-County/City Soil and Water to conduct their first round of testing in Fairview Beach to determine the source of the water contamination. Bennett said they tested about 15 locations, including a Service Authority manhole. He said they were shocked at how much "stuff" was going through the manhole but they felt it would serve as a good data point when determining the source of the contamination. Bennett said that it will take some time to process the tests and get results. He said that when tests were done in November, it was during a very wet period of time and there were several streams flowing. He said with this most recent test, things were much drier so fewer samples were collected than they had hoped for. He felt this may help determine if the surface water was the source of the contamination. Bennett said that out of nine Virginia Department of Health (VDH) tests done so far this year, there have been three advisories for the Potomac River. He said for the four weeks in June, there were no advisories so there may be a correlation between wet weather and the contamination. Bennett also participated in a  conference call with Davenport and Associates earlier in the morning. [EDITOR'S NOTE - Neil Richard, a co-founder of Project94, is the spouse of Yvonne Richard.]

The Consent Agenda was approved.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report.

Davenport and Associates representatives Kyle Laux and Griffin Moore then began their presentation on the search results for a flexible line of credit for the Service Authority. With Moore doing most of the talking during the short presentation, the results looked promising. Moore said that several banks returned proposals however many of them would require the Service Authority to draw down or borrow the full amount of $15 million. He also said several of them had higher than desirable interest rates or a delay in prepayment. In the end, the proposal from Atlantic Union looked the most promising with a fixed interest rate of 2.399%, which was lower than the planned rate of 3%. Included in their proposal was no minimum draw down or loan amount and treated it as a truly flexible line of credit. Additionally, Atlantic Union proposed no minimum withdrawal amount and would allow a prepayment at anytime with no penalty. Moore said that other banks, such as BB&T and Capital One, had higher interest rates, flexible interest rates, or required the full $15 million to be taken out even if it wasn't needed. The next step, said Moore, was to have the Board of Directors and the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution for the line of credit at their August meeting. In concert with this was the debt restructuring process. Both the line of credit and the debt restructuring should be complete by the end of August.

Bennett asked if the stock market would have lower rates in the future, as it seems to be indicated recently. Laux said that they may be able to go back to the bank and get a lower rate if rates do drop. He said that within the last week, it seems that the Fed will take rates down but said the short answer was that if there's a rate decrease before closing, they can certainly go back to the bank. Bennett asked if the current rate of 2.399% was locked in with the bank and Laux said it was. Bennett asked if the maturity date in five years would be for the entire loan amount and what would the Service Authority do if they couldn't pay for it with the cash they had on hand. Laux said the intent was to draw on the line of credit over time and then at the end of five years, use long term financing. He also said that grant funding and other evolutions in the capital program may reduce how much is necessary to finance on a long term basis. Bennett reiterated that the big ticket item was the potential decommissioning of the Purkins Corner and Oakland Park WWTPs, at roughly $9.7 million, as well as bringing pump stations into compliance. He said it won't be hard to spend the money on capital improvements and repairs. Bennett said he was really impressed with Davenport's work and felt they really "nailed it." He said a year ago he wasn't sure "banks would offer us $15 let alone $15 million."

Bennett asked for a motion to approve the plan to allow Davenport to move forward with Atlantic Union. The Board approved but made it contingent on legal review and the Board of Supervisors approval of their moral obligation.

Next on the Agenda was a discussion about the rate section of the Service Authority's regulations. Eric Gregory, County Attorney, explained that in years past, the Board would approve of new rates then amend the regulations to include those new rates. He said this was not a legal requirement but rather a hold over from previous Boards. He continued by explaining that the Board could amend the regulations to remove certain sections. This would result in it no longer being necessary to add an extra step in the process. Gregory was careful to explain that the change would not impact the public hearings that would still remain in place any time a rate change was made. Bennett added that it would also save time and money by not requiring staff to create an additional public notice. Bennett asked how much it would save and Weakley said over $2,000 just in ad expenses. Bennett said he gets in trouble when he says it but he felt like it was a "no brainer" in making this change. He said amending the regulations would also help save time and money when changing the connection fees as they are also included in the old process. Gregory said the desire was to not eliminate the whole section in the regulations but "rather to surgically excise what isn't needed" and to leave what was still necessary. Bennett said that during the joint meeting with the Supervisors and EDA, they discussed how difficult it was to find comparable connection fee rates from surrounding areas. He said his goal was to instead make it easier for people to find. Granger asked if there would be no public hearings for rate increases and Gregory said the public hearing would still remain in place and that public access and transparency would still be there. Bennett said it was essentially removing a second step that wasn't needed. With that, consensus was reached to move forward.

Next was Jonathon Weakley's discussion on fat, oil and grease. He said the industry acronym was FOG and that many jurisdictions have a FOG ordinance or FOG permit in place but King George does not. He said that FOGs will cause problems at WWTPs like clogs in the pipes and overflows at pump stations. Weakley wouldn't name any specific customer but said there was one customer that was the only one served by a pump station and it was repeatedly a source of issues. He said the FOGs inside the pump are often bad enough the pump has to be chiseled out. Weakley said that the initial plan is to simply educate customers on what can and can't be put down the drain as well as what de-greasers, cleaners, and traps are recommended. He said it wasn't a revenue program but more of an education program. Weakley said he was sensitive to the cost burden it would place on businesses but said that there's also a cost burden to the Service Authority in treating the FOG at the WWTP. He said his goal wasn't to come out swinging and label it as enforcement but rather to raise awareness. Bennett asked him to coordinate with Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, and the Economic Development Department to ensure it doesn't create too many issues for businesses. Granger asked if large residential areas could be the cause of high FOG levels at WWTPs and Weakley said it was in some cases but usually FOGs came from restaurants. He said de-greasers can be added. Bennett mentioned grease traps and Dr. Young said they are required but there was no "teeth" to enforcement according to the Community Development Department. Weakley added that the local Health Department is also involved but agreed that there needed to be more teeth in enforcement. With that, consensus was reached.

Weakley then updated the Board on his changes and additions to the job descriptions. Bennett and Werle agreed that he didn't need Board approval for what he wanted to do and it was more of an update than a request for permission. Weakley said he wanted to streamline some positions at the manager level and create positions below that. He said it would put similar jobs on the same level and provide room for advancement from within the department. Weakley said that the County's Human Resources Department has already approved all of the changes. Bennett said that the money for the newly created positions was already in the budget and there was a desire to promote from within. He said this not only allows for people to move up in their career but also allows the Board to do some succession planning in case somebody wants to leave the Service Authority.

Weakley then, as he usually does every meeting, shared his General Manager's report. Once a month he also shares the Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) measurements for each WWTP. With number steadily dropping to within permitted levels, Weakley shared with the Board that the staff at the Dahlgren WWTP has found the best "recipe" to get ideal numbers and it was reflected in the amounts he shared. Dahlgren WWTP has a TN limit of 3.0 mg/L and the June measurement was down to 2.4 mg/L. Although the yearly average is slightly above permitted levels at 4.3 mg/L, he said there were still six months to go and the recipe is locked in. All of the other WWTPs were operating within permitted levels except for Purkins Corner which had a yearly average TN of 10.7 mg/L. The permit limit is 10.0 mg/L. Weakly said staff was still working to get under permit levels and that some of the higher numbers were due to faulty equipment that has been replaced. Bennett asked if the improvements at Dahlgren were because of chemistry or equipment and Weakley said both.

Continuing his report, Weakley said maintenance work has already begun on the water towers and he was pleased by what he saw when he went to inspect their work. He said the Service Authority has been in contact with Dr. Benson, Superintendent of Schools, to keep him informed and that the crews on site felt they may be finished sooner than expected. Regarding the My Place Hotel being constructed in Dahlgren, Weakley said Mr. Murphy submitted the necessary "like place" usage from a My Place Hotel in Lebanon, Tennessee. Bennett asked and Werle confirmed that the hotel is already booked for the first year with 100% occupancy. Bennett said he wanted to make sure the hotel in Tennessee was not operating at 50% occupancy when data was collected and wanted to make sure the Service Authority got viable information to plan for full occupancy. Weakley said they should be able to extrapolate from the data to predict the correct amounts for Dahlgren. Weakley said he was working towards a more formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the school system regarding the owner/agent agreement. He said he found nothing on file, nothing signed, and no record of one other than an incomplete draft from former management. Gregory said he had no immediate thoughts on the MOU but would certainly like to discuss it with Weakley.

With that, the Board entered into Closed Session at 7:50pm and invited Gregory, Young, and Weakley to attend. They returned from Closed Session at 8:57pm and adjourned immediately after.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Absent:
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on August 6, 2019 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.

SUBSCRIBE OR DONATE

You can subscribe via email here. You can make a charitable donation here.

Monday, June 24, 2019

2019-06-18 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The King George County Service Authority Board of Directors opened their meeting at 6:31pm.

There were no amendments to the Agenda.

Mike Bennett, Chair, opened the meeting by informing everyone that this would be the third meeting in a row with a Public Hearing. He said the first hearing was regarding the 10% increase in rates for the coming year but because it wasn't sufficiently advertised, another hearing had to be held at the last meeting. Bennett said tonight's hearing was for the overall five year rate plan which included additional rate increases. He said the previously published newspaper article was incorrect in stating that the ten percent increase would be every year for the next five years. Instead, he said, next year's rate was already approved to go up 10%. The following years would increase 4%, 4%, 4%, then finally 3%. Bennett said the five year rate plan was required by Virginia Resources Authority (VRA) as a part of the Service Authority's plan to restructure their debt. He said the restructuring would allow for lower debt payments in the short term to allow for needed repairs and maintenance to be paid for. He reminded the audience that they would have two opportunities to speak, first at the beginning of the meeting, then again during the Public Hearing portion. He said because of the full Agenda and the Board of Supervisors meeting that followed, he would be strictly enforcing the three minute limit. He then opened the floor for comment.

There was no Public Comment.

Chris Werle gave a brief report that the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) approved and issued the permit for the Fairview Beach riverbank stabilization project. Werle said he thought that should be the last permit needed but Bennett added that the Army Corps of Engineers should still have a final say. Bennett jokingly chided Werle for forgetting them, especially since he was a former member of the group, and Werle chuckled and said "shame on me."

Richard Granger and Cathy Binder had no report.

Ruby Brabo said that she learned about a joint agency initiative between Federal and local governments at a recent meeting at Fort A. P. Hill. She said a workshop would be held in August.

Mike Bennett said that for years he has been involved in finding the contamination problem in Fairview Beach. He said that he had two points to clarify. First, he said the water that is contaminated in the Potomac River is not the drinking water from the Service Authority. Second, the funds being used by Tri-County/City Soil and Water to track the source was actually money paid to them by the Service Authority as a penalty in years past. He said that it wasn't a good thing that the Service Authority had to pay a penalty but it was good that the money ended up coming back to help them.

The Consent Agenda was approved.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had an update on the lease agreement with KGI Communications. He said once the Public Hearing was held by the Board of Supervisors, the terms will be finalized. Bennett added that the contract had pretty much been approved a year ago but KGI had to wait on the FCC to get approval for their specific frequencies. There were also some minor changes to be made in the contract as well as adjusting for KGI not being able to provide free internet at the Dahlgren Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) because of the proximity to the Navy base in Dahlgren.

The Public Hearing for the five year rate structure was next on the agenda. The only person to speak during Public Comment was Miriam Niemi who asked if the Board had thought about a monthly payment cycle for Service Authority bills instead of the once every two-month cycle currently in use. She said the current method doesn't really work for budgeting.

With no other comments, Bennett said that the Board has considered it and discussed it in the past. He said they have tried to make it clear what the monthly changes would be for the new rate increases and that generally speaking, all of them were in favor of a monthly bill. Bennett said it's not as easy as it sounds though "since we're the government" but the Board was thinking about it. Brabo added that the current accounting software used for billing can't do monthly bills.

Jonathon Weakley, General Manager, then gave a brief overview of the five year rate plan. He thanked the Board, the citizens that volunteered for the Citizen Budget Advisory Committee, and Davenport and Associates for their help. Weakley said that the plan helps free free up funds in the near term as well as restructures the debt over time. He said that the rates would still be reviewed every year to make sure the proper thresholds are met. [EDITOR'S NOTE - Neil Richard, a co-founder of Project94, was a member of the Service Authority Citizen Budget Advisory Committee.]

Bennett added that everyone on the Citizen Budget Advisory Committee was a Service Authority customer and all were in favor of the planned increases. He said the Service Authority needed to get their financial house in order as well as get facilities into compliance. He said part of that would be rate increases, but part would also be restructuring or refinancing the debt. He added that the rates can be changed annually but the VRA requires the plan to be in place before restructuring can occur. Weakley added that the VRA resolution would be later in the evening. The five year rate plan was approved.

Next was the Debt Restructuring presentation by Sands Anderson and Davenport and Associates. Due to technical issues, the presentation was not visible on the projector however it mirrored much of what was presented in previous budget meetings. The biggest change was the inclusion of more precise dollar amounts. With the Board already approving the five year rate plan, the two items left that Davenport asked the Board to act on were the approval of the resolutions later in the meeting and the approval to participate in the Summer 2019 VRA Pool.

Going into more detail about the debt restructuring, not all of the debt would be refinanced. Of the roughly $25 million in total debt, the Service Authority would refinance about $16 million. This would free up about $1 million per year in cash for the Service Authority to use for necessary repairs and maintenance. Bennett asked where grant money would fit into the process and Davenport said it would only make things better. Grant money was not factored into the plan as it wasn't a definite but it would certainly help. Bennett also asked about the Debt Service Coverage ratio, which is the cash to debt ratio. VRA only requires a ratio of 1.0, or $1 dollar of revenue for every $1 dollar of debt, but the plan from Davenport put the ratio at 1.22 or higher, meaning there was a plan to have more revenue than debt.

Bennett commended Davenport for their hard work and timely responses. He said he was really impressed by how fast things were turned around. Bennett said he wasn't impressed by how many problems the Service Authority has but was impressed by how many solutions Davenport was able to come up with.

In addition to the debt restructuring and long term rate plan, the Service Authority will also seek a line of credit. The idea is to have the flexibility to draw money to pay for projects that currently have an unknown cost. While grants may cover these costs, known issues don't have an assigned cost yet and new problems may arise. The final task for the Service Authority is to adopt updated financial policies.

Weakley asked about the line of credit and what the draw down schedule would look like and if there would be a fee for taking no money out or less than the minimum. Because every bank has different rules, Davenport said it was an unknown right now but as proposals came in for the line of credit, those questions could be answered.

Moving on with the Agenda, Wilma Ward, Director of Finance, asked for the adoption of the FY2019-2020 Operating and Capital Budgets. It was approved.

Next, Werle gave a brief update on the Fairview Beach riverbank stabilization project. He said that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has the project in their hands going on six months and will require an environmental assessment to be done. Werle said FEMA told him that process could take another six months and that, because the area was already at risk, he suggested paying Schnabel Engineering to conduct the study since they would be able to accomplish it faster. Werle said that some grant money is available to pay for it and that it would only take one big storm to wash things away and that the sewer line would be the first thing to go. The Board approved.

Next was the approval of the VRA Resolution. As requested, there was a roll call vote, an odd procedure where every member casts their vote individually.

Weakley then presented his request to enter into a contract for water tank maintenance. He said there was one in the past but it lapsed at some point and was never renewed or replaced. Weakley said that adding the required chlorine to the water has an adverse impact on the tanks if they are not properly maintained. He said the proposed contract was for nine years with the ability to expand out to 15 years. His objective was to approve the contract as soon as possible in order to get the company started on the Purkins Corner tank so there was enough time to finish before school started in the fall. The Board approved spending $67,450 for the first year of the contract.

Weakley then presented his General Manager's report. He thanked Eric Gregory and Lavita Cobb for their help in getting the water tank maintenance contract completed.Weakley continued by saying he's had some developers knocking on the door asking about the the capacity of the Courthouse water system and he wanted to make sure that the Service Authority stayed within the daily, monthly, and yearly withdrawal limits on the permit. Brabo asked Werle if there were negotiations or future planning done for the Courthouse permits to allow for future development in the area. Werle said he had not been involved with the process. Brabo said that it may be safe to assume that taking future development into consideration wasn't done and it may cause future growth to be restricted. Werle said that modifications to the existing permit can be applied for and that development would be a valid reason to do so.

Weakley continued his report saying that the annual Consumer Confidence Reports had been mailed and notification was sent to the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) as required. Lead and copper sampling plans were also sent to VDH for approval. He said the Courthouse water system would be flushed in the near future and alerts would be sent via the KGAlert system.

On the waste water side of the Service Authority, Weakley gave updated numbers for the Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) for all five waste water treatment plants (WWTPs). Dahlgren WWTP was over the permitted TN limit of 3.0 mg/L with 4.7 mg/L for the year. He did say that the preliminary numbers for the last few weeks looked much better and that the improvements to the "recipe for success" would be put into writing so that current and future staff would know what needed to be done. Purkins Corner WWTP was the only other facility to be over their allowed amounts. With a permitted level of 10.0 mg/L TN, the year to date amount was 10.7 mg/L. Weakley said that this was largely due to mechanical issues earlier in the year and that new mixers had been installed and more were on the way. Weakley also noted that the Oakland Park WWTP was still seeing darker effluent and that it was still being investigated to find the source. He also said that the new employee at the facility was doing a phenomenal job and noted that Mr. Turner was excited and absorbed everything he learned. Weakley thanked Tim Maciejewski for helping train the new employee. Weakley said that the Purkins Corner WWTP was also being evaluated by Wiley Wilson to determine if it would be best to decommission the plant or build a new one. Bennett added that some of the analysis was already done on decommissioning Oakland Park and Purkins Corner WWTPs, but because of potential development in the Purkins Corner area, and the amount of land available for use, there were more options available to the Service Authority. Bennett said that there's a potential for 1,400 units in the area and that the silver lining was that the Service Authority would get a connection fee for every home built.

Weakley ended his report saying he worked with the Arlington Catholic Diocese for their upcoming work camp being based at the high school.

Bennett was getting ready to close the meeting and asked if anyone had anything else to bring before the Board when Brabo mentioned the proposed meeting for July. Bennett said he would get to that in a minute then jokingly said "unless Mr. Bueche wanted to take up some of their time." After a few chuckles, Bennett went on to explain that the Board doesn't normally meet in July but that he and Werle talk nearly every day and he felt like there was enough going on with the Service Authority that it warranted a special meeting in July to stay on top of things. With that, he said the Board would meet on July 16.

There was no Closed Session.

The meeting adjourned at 8:09pm.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on June 20, 2019 at 5:00 pm at Company 1.

Previous Meeting:
The previous Service Authority Meeting was not covered by Project94.

Monday, June 3, 2019

An Interview with Mike Bennett - Local Leaders #7


by Neil Richard


Introduction


The basic idea behind this interview series is to interview local leaders that live, work, or have an important impact on King George County. We have asked various citizens for recommendations on who they see as a local leader. Additionally, we feel that everyone has a story and it deserves to be told. So we want to know their story. As you can see with the questions below, we want to share their  story with the rest of the citizens in King George County. If you have somebody you would like to nominate for a future interview, please contact us.

Mike Bennett sharing his view of the Potomac River.


Editor's Note:

As with my interview with Mike Muncie, some of our conversation was not included in the final product as it didn't necessarily pertain to the questions asked. Mike Bennett is great at telling stories as they pertain to the questions asked but I didn't feel all were necessarily relevant. And just like Muncie, Bennett is somebody that you can easily find yourself sitting down and having a pleasant conversation with.

Basic Biographical Information


I grew up in Montgomery County, Maryland so I went to high school there. The school is no longer in existence. Went to the University of Maryland and got an undergrad degree in government and politics. Then I went to law school at Catholic University although I'm not Catholic. Not that I have any problem with that it's just that most people when they hear that they assume I'm Catholic. I went to law school at night while I was working full time for the D. C. Superior Court. And then when I graduated I took the bar exam in both Maryland and D. C. and passed both. So I was licensed to practice in both Maryland and DC. I'm no longer licensed anywhere. When I moved to Virginia I was not licensed here and you can't waive into Virginia unfortunately. And I didn't want to take another bar exam and learn the law here. And besides, I was retired by the time I moved here full time. So I let both of my licenses lapse there so I didn't have to pay the annual dues.

I spent most of my career with the Federal Government. I did work with the D. C. government for about eight years then I switched over to the VA [Veteran's Affairs]. I had basically three jobs in the VA. It was then the District Council's Office and they represent the local agencies in D. C. I did a lot of real estate there. Then I went to the General Council's Office. It was too bureaucratic for me. Then I found a job as an attorney in the Inspector General's office and so I ended up in the office of investigations there. I represented 150 special agents around the country and I worked with them as an in-house council for investigations. The VA is an interesting agency and they have a great mission. I'm not a veteran myself. I was just too young for the Vietnam War but I did have a draft number but they never got to that for my year.

But my father was in Iwo Jima with the Army. But the VA is a great agency. They do education benefits, medical, disability, medical care, so it touches on all aspects of society. Homelessness, there's just so many different things you can do in the VA. However you want to serve.

For Boards and Committees, I'm the Chair of the Service Authority Board of Directors. I'm the President of the Fairview Beach Resident's Association. I'm on my second two-year term. Vice President for at least two terms and I've been on the Board since about 2010. We've lived here full time since 2010, that's when I retired. I was on the YMCA Board. I just got off that this year. Being head of two other boards was enough. I feel like I'm failing retirement as it is. My wife and I joke about that but I am not joking when I say I've never worked this hard in my life for so little money. But we're blessed and fortunate to have two Federal pensions that are generous enough that we can live here. We were very lucky to get the house. We never thought we could afford waterfront property. We're both middle class kids. But the house kind of fell into our laps.

In the past I served on a number of boards for the church I was active in. I was in various roles from the church trustees to the deacons to building committee. All kinds of stuff. When you're a lawyer, you're in some demand to help out on smaller organizations' boards. They had a Christian school and I was on the school board there for a number of years.

Personal Questions


What do you remember about your grandparents?
My mom was from Johnstown, Pennsylvania. My grandfather on my mother's side died when I was two. He worked at the steel mill in Johnstown so I didn't really know him. Although we found some articles about him recently and he was apparently really a big deal in the community. He was in the American Legion, he was in World War I, and he was in a lot of civic associations. He was valedictorian in his class. I saw a newspaper article about the speech he gave about the dangers of Hitler in the mid-30s. Apparently he was a huge sports fan and when I was a baby took me to football games. So I'm sorry I didn't get to know him. My grandmother, she died when I was maybe nine or ten. She was a great lady.

My dad was from South Carolina. Charleston. So we kinda had the North and the South in my family, the Southerners and Yankees. My grandfather, my father's father, was sort of the family scoundrel so I don't know much about him. My grandmother on my father's side was the one that had the biggest impact on me. She had a house in Seat Pleasant, Maryland and she had a giant garden. She grew her own peanuts. Her own grapes and made jelly from them. She cooked her fried chicken in Crisco, probably a heart attack on a plate. But she was also just a great lady. She survived on Social Security after my grandfather died. He had cancer for most of my life and he really wasn't able to get out and about much. She took care of him but then when he died, I think I was fourteen, she kind of spread her wings and was active in her church and was in a bowling league and did all kinds of stuff. I remember we went to see her once and we couldn't find her. She was 88 years old and she was on a ladder in the back of her house cleaning out her gutters. She was a tough old gal and a real sweet lady. Not very well off financially but had a ton of dignity and honesty. Of all my grandparents, I knew her the best. She lived to be 93 or so. She lived the longest so I knew her the best. No pretensions, just a good person.

What historical events influenced your life the most?
I'm a little older than you so I'm going to go back to some things you probably learned about in History. Probably the first thing that influenced me a lot is the assassination of JFK. I was only a kid then, I was only about eight or nine, but I remember how the whole country seemed to stop. We only had three or four TV channels then and every one of them was on Kennedy assassination coverage every day and the whole country seemed to come to a stop for a while.

Then of course the Vietnam War was the next major thing in my life. I graduated high school in 1972 so the war was probably winding down a little at that point but it was, again, on TV every single night for years and years and years. Hugely controversial. A lot of distrust in the government. A lot of bad feelings towards veterans, unfairly enough. Sort of shaped my view of veterans down the road that no matter what they needed to be treated better than they were treated after Vietnam. I think we've tried to make amends there but the damage was done in a lot of cases.

Then of course Watergate would have been the next major one for me. Nixon's impeachment and resignation. I had already sort of thought that being a lawyer was where I wanted to go. So I remember vividly, I was at the University of Maryland, I was literally taking the course The Presidency when Nixon resigned. So it was a pretty good teaching tool. We read the headlines every day to see how that fit in with historical understanding of the Presidency and the government.

Not recently but more recently than all of those is 9/11 that had the biggest impact. I saw that Mike Muncie had mentioned that and he's right, I remember the day. I was at work when the first tower was hit. The Assistant Inspector General for Investigations had a TV in his office and everyone was in there, gathered around, word had spread and all 25 of us were there. We saw the first tower smoking and watched live as the second tower was hit. Then we got sent home and everyone was in a panic. Riding Metro then was worse than any snow day. We were jammed in like sardines and the panic in the air was really palpable. It's probably the last time I remember the country really pulling together which is kind of sad since it's been 18 years. But everyone pulled together for awhile and tried to make the changes that were necessary as a nation whether it was airport security or homeland security or whatever the changes were. Government agencies began to cooperate better. It's a shame that it takes something like that to get us to work together. As Americans we don't make changes a lot of times unless we have to.

Outside of work and home, what is your favorite place in King George?
Probably my favorite place is here in Fairview Beach. I think this is one of the prettiest spots for hundreds of miles and we get to live here.

My favorite place to hang out in King George County lately is the Administration Building. I'm spending an awful lot of time in meetings. Five or six last week. A little less this week. So my hobby at the moment, pathetic I know, is the Service Authority. Just in the amount of time spent. Is it my favorite? I don't know that i would go there.

We have a bunch of grandkids that live in Frederick, Maryland. It's a bit of a hike but we love to hang out with them. Or they'll come here and we'll do water stuff every year.

I like King George, the vibe, I actually like Fredericksburg too. The downtown area, restaurants, the symphony at the college. I like the college town vibe of Fredericksburg. I would like to spend in the not too distant future a little less time on County business.

I think there's a lot of neat places you can get to in King George for a day trip.

What person, place, or thing do you think is the most underappreciated in King George County?
That's a tough one. I mean, obviously I'm a Fairview Beach fan and I could argue that a lot of people don't know much about it. I remember a former Supervisor when we first moved here full time, we had been weekend folks for ten years before that and Gloria [his wife] has been here since 1989 as a weekender, but one of the members of the Board of Supervisors who had been on for multiple terms had never been to Fairview Beach. And I know most people  know it either because of Rick's or Tim's and that's one aspect of it. But it's not what I like the most about it. I don't think that's the best of Fairview Beach. It's fun to party but a weekday in the summer and you get on the water and there's nobody around you, I think that's the jewel of King George County. I like the Rappahannock too. Like I say, I'm a water guy, but I haven't spent much time over there. I'd like to spend more time over there, maybe kayak.


Professional Questions


Who is your inspiration or mentor?
Professionally or in life?

I would say number one on my list would be my father. He was probably the most honest person I ever met. The story I would use to illustrate that is that we were going on vacation one year and we got got up real early and loaded up the car. I don't remember where we were going but he stopped at a local 7-11 on the way to the Beltway and he went to get a Washington Post, which we read religiously every morning. I still do. He always gave me the Sports which was fine by me. But what happened was we went to the 7-11 and it wasn't even open yet. But the newspapers had been delivered. So he took one out and left a dime which is what it cost at the time. And I remember I was maybe 8 or 10 and at that age, I said "Dad, you could just take the paper and nobody would know." And he said "Mike, I'll know." Then he said "And now, you'll know." So he said "It's only ten cents and it's the right thing to do. If I didn't do that I'd be stealing and I'm not going to do that." I hadn't really looked at it that way. Obviously that's a long time ago and I remember that. I think throughout his life he was the most honest, decent person I've ever met. I just think he was a reasonable guy and I think today's a good example of everybody yelling and screaming at each other. Reasonableness is in short supply. He cared about trying to get things done. I would say he's the number one positive influence in my life. Good sense of humor. Corny as hell.

I had a minister that was also a mentor in some ways. He confirmed a lot of the lessons that my dad taught me throughout life. When I was out on my own but still there was a lot of the same lessons. The main lesson I remember from him was that the ends do not justify the means. He used to say that it doesn't matter if you're trying to get the right thing done, if you do it in the wrong way then it's not right. I think he probably said it was a sin to do it the wrong way. It's not just what you do but how you do it. I think that's a lesson that's valuable in both work and life. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. It's all sort of the same philosophy. You can disagree with people without having a fight. It's harder these day but it's still something we ought to do, especially in a place like King George County, and on a smaller scale Fairview Beach.

So this minister and my dad were real examples of trying to figure out a way to work together, band together. Let's find out what people can do. Treat them with respect.  It's actually worked out for me pretty good. I don't agree with everybody. I'm sure everybody doesn't agree with me. But I can normally work with almost everybody. We don't have to be friends. We don't have to have a beer together. But we do have to accomplish things together sometimes. I think between my dad and that minister, you've really got to figure out what other people can do well and what their motivation is. Just try to work with that as best you can and come out with a win-win for everybody.

Another big influence on me has been Gloria, my wife. She's one of the smartest people I know. We've been married 14 years now. What I've learned from her, which proves that old dogs can learn new tricks, is that she's a really good listener. I'm not saying I'm as good as she is but I'm better than I used to be. Sometimes it's better to just let other people talk and see where they're coming from. It gives them the opportunity to talk and ask questions. Just get them talking. It's not necessarily my natural inclination but I do think it's valuable and I think it's important. It makes the other person feel respected and valued. Then lo and behold they have something to say and you can look at it differently.  It works out in the end.

I had a boss who was a really strong influence on me for all of the wrong reasons. She did not listen well. She was extremely judgemental. She was hyper-critical. She did not work well with others. Even though she was extremely smart and incredibly hard working, she was not a team player at all. She was a level above me and obviously my boss but I never would have traded places with her. I would much rather have my career and the teams I was a part of. I enjoyed that. Even our Citizen Advisory group at the [Service Authority] budget work sessions. There have been a couple meetings where I felt like we really came together as a team by the end. We tried to listen to everybody and everybody's got something to say. I think it's been a good experience. I think it's good to hear from people not on the board and have an outsider's experience. Citizens that are active in the community. I think we need to do that. I like being part of a team. I've played a lot of team sports in my life. I'm not the world's greatest athlete. Sometimes you can be more than the sum of your parts.

What is your ideal vision for King George County in the future?
The future of King George is tricky. I think a lot of us like it pretty much the way it is but we all know that things change. You can't stop it. The best you can do is manage it. So things are going to change and they are going to be different. So how do we allow those differences to take place and still preserve what we like about King George. The lack of traffic. The accessibility to public officials. The small town feel to it. And still get the kind of development that we need to be able to fund the services we want. So I think it's a challenge. The Service Authority is a perfect example. We have to have more customers. We will gradually. But we need more customers to spread out the financial burden of the system but we don't want to be Prince William County. So there's a happy medium there obviously. We don't have to be Prince William County. I happened to be there yesterday and the traffic was unbelievable. We don't want that in King George County but with the 301 bridge coming, change is coming. There's no way around it. We have to manage it, control it, in a way that preserves what we like about King George County. I don't know that we're going to be this sleepy, rural county forever. But I think all of us like that about King George, most of us anyway. We like that small town atmosphere and you want to be able to preserve that but you have to be able to grow. You can't stay still or you'll be a dying town. So King George has to somehow grow and stay strong and meeting our challenges without losing our identity. I think that's a hard needle to thread. I've talked to Dr. Young and I think he understands that clearly. And I think the Supervisors do too. But there are different points of emphasis. It's just a hard challenge.

What do you feel are the top 3 issues to address in King George?
I think one is medical obviously. I think everybody would say that. Coming from suburban Maryland and then Northern Virginia, there's a million doctors and great hospitals. It took us a while to find a good doctor in Fredericksburg. But it's in Fredericksburg, not in King George. My dentist is in Fredericksburg. They're fine. I have no issue with them. But if I could drive 15 minutes instead of 30, then I would. And I live on the west end of the County. If you live on the east end of the County, it's an hour to Fredericksburg. And I know maybe people go to La Plata but who wants to go across the bridge. So I think medical care is key. I reported on the Hertenstein development and plans and it's the first time I ever met him but I'm certainly rooting for him. He's got some interesting ideas and plans that would really be helpful for King George.

As an aside, if he's looking at 100 homes for 55 plus age homes, that's a good thing for a county to have because you don't tax the schools. So you have these residents who are paying taxes but are less of a burden on the system. It's a service that isn't required for those residents. So I think that would be a good thing to have in the County. I know a number of people from La Plata and Charles County moved here because taxes are lower so maybe Hertenstein is on to something there.

To get back to the question, as I said before, I think managing the change in development is key. 301 corridor is going to get complicated. Some of that is a good thing but how you get it done is complicated. When the base changed their crazy rules for getting on to the base in the morning, we were going somewhere, north on 301, I don't remember where but we couldn't get out of King George for an hour. That's enough to tear your hair out. So if it's that bad for such a small change, imagine doubling or tripling the number of cars coming through there. It's not all bad, it could be a good thing but it's really going to take skill to manage that.

And I'll throw in the Service Authority as a third one. It may not be on everyone's list but we have so many challenges before us just across the board. Our customers deserve high quality water and good customer service and it would be nice to make that whole system more sustainable and more functional. Spread the cost a little bit with more customers. That's going to be a factor, meeting the needs of the County going forward as development comes and changes occur.

I don't know if those are the same three issues all the Supervisors would agree with but those are the ones I would choose.

What do you feel are the top 3 successes in King George?
From what I know, the schools have improved over the last few years. I've seen T. C. Collins' presentation numerous times but his statistics are impressive. The schools have improved dramatically. I know there's still a fight over teacher compensation although to some degree that's a national problem. So I don't know where King George schools rank, I don't have kids here but my sense is they have improved and I think that's important to the County as a whole.

I think the improvements made to fund the Sheriff's Office and Fire and Rescue have been significant for the County.  We now have a working firehouse in Fairview Beach so we know first hand what the advantages of that are and how much of a difference it makes. We now have working fire hydrants which we didn't have when we first moved down here. We didn't have enough water pressure to sustain that. Those are real dramatic changes to the quality of life for the people that live here. When you have Fire and Rescue and Police staffing improving and all of those things.

From the Fairview Beach perspective, I would say the third major improvement I've seen in my time here is that the Board of Supervisors is far more helpful and willing to work with us than they were in the past. I'm not sure what happened with the Board that predates me but somehow the County and Fairview Beach got off on the wrong foot or weren't working well together. I don't know about the prior Supervisors and the rest of the County, I only know about the prior Supervisors and Fairview Beach and we just didn't seem to be able to cooperate on many things. The FEMA grant for the riverbank stabilization is a perfect example. If Ruby Brabo had not supported that as a Supervisor, it never would have happened. And there was a chance for a FEMA grant ten or twelve years ago before I got here. I've seen the documentation and the County didn't support it. Which is kind of insane when the government is going to give you 75 percent of the money and the state is going to give you up to another 20 percent. It's just not even in the County's interest not to do that but for whatever reason that support was lacking. So that's been a difference that I've seen in my time here as a full time resident. I think the County has been much more responsive to Fairview Beach and much more helpful with our problems. I don't know if that's a county-wide success story or not.

What person, place, or thing do you think we lack in King George?
We lack a really good steak house. We lack a really good seafood restaurant. If you want a really good steak, if there's one in King George County, please let me know but I'm not aware of it. I think we're getting more and more fast food restaurants but I think a nice place to go get dinner would be nice. You know, you go through so many small towns and we don't really have a downtown area. We don't have a central meeting place, location point, or whatever. Fairview Beach is kind of better because it's so small. You go for a golf cart ride and you're gone for an hour and a half because you stop and see everybody. King George doesn't really have a central place like that. Dahlgren is getting to be a place where you can run a bunch of errands. You can go to Walmart. There's a bunch of stuff you can do down there. You can grab something to eat. But it's not really like a nice downtown area. It's gotten more convenient I think, you don't have to go to Fredericksburg for a lot of things but if you want a really nice restaurant, it's sort of not here.

Colonial Beach even has some nice restaurants but I think King George is missing that. Maybe King George has failed to take advantage of the two rivers it sits between. Between the Potomac and the Rappahannock, I think they're both beautiful. They both have many, many options for tourism and recreation. Before we were blessed enough to have a house on the water, we would go to a place on the water. We would drive there. Even in Florida where we stay, it's not on the water but we manage to go there. Maybe not everybody likes water as much as we do but I think those are incredible resources in King George County and I don't think they've taken advantage of that.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

2019-05-21 - Service Authority Meeting Notes

by Neil Richard

The Service Authority Board of Directors got off to a later start than normal and opened their meeting at 6:32 pm.

There were amendments to the Agenda to add the action item to approve the five year rate plan advertisement during June.

There was no Public Comment.

Christopher Werle began his board report by saying he fielded a call from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) regarding the Fairview Beach riverbank stabilization project. Werle said the May 13th phone call was an update from Debbie Messmer at VDEM related to the status of the project as it was currently being reviewed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA has had the final design since December 2018 and as of last week was still reviewing it. Werle said that it is unlikely FEMA will give any substantive comments on the design, there will need to be an Environmental Assessment (EA) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Because FEMA is funding the project, they are required to pay for the EA. Werle said there was hope that the stabilization project would qualify for a categorical exclusion under NEPA but the County Engineer and he had determined that the EA was required under the law. Werle read from a long, but not all inclusive, list of topics the EA looks at before saying it could take three to six months to complete. Once completed, the EA will tell FEMA if the project will need an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or if it gets the thumbs-up with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Werle said the bottom line was that it looked like FEMA approval for the project wouldn't come until next year. Werle also stated that VDEM can contract out the EA but there was no additional funding for that.

Ruby Brabo added during his report that the Federal representatives should get involved as we were approaching hurricane season. Werle said he didn't think that would have much impact on FEMA moving any faster. Werle said FEMA is well aware of the situation. During the discussion of funding for the EA, Brabo asked what the cost would be to the County. Werle said we don't know yet but it would still take six months to complete. Brabo asked why the County couldn't do the EA and Werle said he asked that question and was told that the County would not be reimbursed for the expense. Mike Bennett added that contacting our Federal representatives may not hurt but as a former Federal employee it may not help. Bennett said that at various points he was charged with responding to Congressional inquiries on stuff he was working on and that the squeaky wheel may get the grease but it doesn't always move things along faster.

Werle added that there were several plants and animals that may be impacted in the area such as a relative of the pea plant, the northern long eared bat, and various species of fish. He said even if they are present in the project site, they may not stop the project from moving forward. Bennett said he was a fan of bats since they eat mosquitoes. He said they shouldn't be impacted because no trees would be removed. He also commented that Jeff Bueche said a larger environmental impact may occur if a sewer line breaks and spills into the Potomac River. Bennett also noted that in the report it mentioned "surgeons" being impacted instead of "sturgeons." The audience gave a chuckle when he said he doubted they cared about the impact to doctors. Werle said they ran into the sturgeon issue in Hopyard and were told work had to be delayed until after July 1 to avoid their spawning season. Brabo commented that government just takes way too long.

Dr. Neiman Young, County Administrator, asked Werle if he had a ballpark idea how much the cost would be to the County. Werle said he did but couldn't disclose it as it may be a proprietary figure. Bennett said if the project didn't start quickly it would be winter before the project began and that was only if the riverbank survived another hurricane season. Werle ended his report by saying he attended the COMREL meeting on the 21st.

Richard Granger, Cathy Binder, and Ruby Brabo had no report.

Mike Bennett apologized and said he did have a report. He participated in a conference call on the 13th related to the stabilization project. On the 16th he met with Hertenstein and others to discuss the Service Authority requirements related to the phasing of the proposed development in the Route 3 and Route 301 area. The question was related to the capacity of the existing Purkins Corner Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) and if it could be expanded or replaced. Bennett said in his opinion it was better to have a new plant that appealed to potential developers instead of decommissioning the plant and sending everything to Hopyard WWTP. Bennett also attended a meeting with Davenport in Richmond to discuss the debt restructuring with Virginia Resources Authority (VRA). Bennett said that they made their case and that Davenport gave a great presentation and answered questions. He said the VRA's requirement was to have the five year rate plan approved via a public hearing and that Eric Gregory, County Attorney, worked on the language to make it legal. While the VRA wanted the rates set in stone, the current Board cannot force a future Board to take action.

The Consent Agenda was approved.

The County Attorney, Eric Gregory, had no report. Bennett again thanked Gregory for all of his hard work.

Next was a presentation by Ryan Gandy, Director of Economic Development. Gandy quickly reviewed the new incentive program that he has been working on with the Economic Development Authority (EDA). In summary, the company requesting funds must be registered and have a Federal Employer Identification Number (EIN), must be located within King George, must not be delinquent on their tax payments, and must submit a budget. The business must also not relocate outside of the County within the agreed upon time frame. Gandy said the funds cannot be awarded retroactively nor can they be given to an individual.

After his presentation, Brabo said that the sticker shock for small businesses was due to the Service Authority connection fees, especially as they relate to the other costs of starting a new business. She said it is a conversation to have. Brabo said a review was being done on economic incentives and recommended Gandy should look at the findings when they're released. Gandy said the results are already out and the study only looked at state level incentives, not local incentives. He said that generally speaking, the results said that grants worked better than tax breaks because a grant would be towards a specific project where a tax break would be towards an entire industry.

Dr. Young added that he and Gandy had several discussions about the policy and felt it was a little muddy because it dealt with three different groups, the Board of Supervisors, the EDA, and the Service Authority. Young said so far the discussion on the impact has only been internal to the interested parties and felt it should be a combined conversation with all three groups. To that end, Young asked if they could schedule a special joint meeting between the three. Brabo agreed.

Bennett said that connection fees are high but he wasn't too concerned with residential connection fees as the cost would be spread out over 30 years and be a part of the mortgage. He said the same wasn't really true for a business and the Service Authority didn't want to stand in the way of a small business. However, he cautioned, he didn't want to see a big chain like Wendy's qualify as a small business. Bennett also mentioned that low income residential customers can apply to be on a payment plan whereas small businesses cannot. He felt that it would be fair to apply the same logic to a small business. Bennett said he wasn't quite clear on how the connection fees were calculated and Werle said it was based on the meter size and throughput of water. Werle also added that the new Tractor Supply paid the same price as a residential customer because they had a smaller meter put in and use less water. Consensus was then reached on a joint meeting date for June 20th.

The Board then "affirmed and ratified" the public notices and hearings for June 4th along with the five year rate plan. There was some discussion as to ensuring that even though the rates are set for the next five years, they still require Public Hearings and a Board vote to approve them each year. It was also cautioned that the Board only voted to approve advertising the Public Hearing, not the rates themselves. Bennett said the point was to give the public the chance to come and comment on the five year plan and that the future rates are still subject to public hearings every year.

5 Year Rate Plan Public Notice


Next was the General Manager's report by Jonathon Weakley. He started by thanking Gregory for his hard work reviewing everything and keeping Davenport informed about the VRA vote tonight. Weakley said he met with water tank maintenance contractors and met with the contractor for the Walnut Hill booster station. He said the booster station is not complete yet and he will be meeting with them to review the design. Weakley said they are working to address comments from the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) regarding the Consumer Confidence Reports and that he toured the Port Royal well system to see if it would be a reasonable design for the Nindes water system. He said it looked very nice but cautioned that it was a different system and may not be applicable here. Weakley said the Fairview Beach water system flush had been completed. Bennett added that one of the joys of serving on the Board is taking Weakley water samples when the water is brown. Weakley said he "got that mason jar sir, thank you" which caused the audience to laugh. There was also some discussion about the use of orthophosphate to combat the discolored water and they agreed that it would not impact the WWTPs because it would be such a small amount.

Weakley also said that repairs had been made to a water line in Presidential Lakes. Weakley noted that a utility contractor had damaged the line even though they were properly marked and they would be receiving a bill for the time and material used to make repairs. He also said that one customer had to be left without water for the night before repairs could be made and that they supplied them with several cases of water and that they were very understanding.

On the wastewater side of things, Weakley said that they continue to review testing at all five WWTPs and that the pump station Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) meeting would begin soon. Weakley said they were continuing to troubleshoot sewer pressure issues in the industrial park and that new pressure gauges were installed. He said that they have yet to see the high pressure that customers are complaining about but data will continue to be collected. Weakley also said he met with the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on the 14th and then went through each WWTP and their latest Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus amounts. At the Oakland Park WWTP, he said they were working to locate the source of abnormal influent at the plant and that once located, they would have a nice conversation with the source about their lack of pre-treatment.

In other news, Weakley said that the budget would need to be appropriated in June since the Board does not meet in July. He also said they were working with the County's Finance Department regarding billing issues and that he had an upcoming meeting with a developer looking at a potential project on Indiantown Road. Weakley said he was also in talks with a land owner about a potential interconnect of the Circle water system.

There was no Closed Session.

The meeting adjourned at 7:55 pm.

Meeting Attendees:
Christopher Werle (Board of Directors)
Jonathon Weakley (General Manager of Service Authority)
Richard Granger (Board of Supervisors)
Michael Bennett (Chairman, Citizen)
Ruby Brabo (Board of Supervisors)
Cathy Binder (Board of Supervisors)
Neiman Young (County Administrator)
Eric Gregory (County Attorney)

Meeting Agenda

Next Meeting:
The Service Authority will next meet on June 4, 2019 at 6:30 pm at the Revercomb Building.

Previous Meeting:
Read about the previous Service Authority Meeting.